From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3848E2FBDFD; Sun, 17 May 2026 10:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779012363; cv=none; b=KhUyUczOMGhNMFZa24wWm52heaA/DGwFeUSwWMEMfCVxacz58utT6nxQtPgSvw7P8hi+/hVMsDNOkLSxqxd8Cr74zWYownyfCnRiHQOKPKC69cCN02l5F6npURQLrqEl5zdkZQYNeebLmxu+I6ihACad/38Anl5eJwlUfhHFWUA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779012363; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5ZcF1iuhgpZRaRKi7D1apExht7Ot8MG/oztV7oYXe9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mLE2oOJ+LhbpjKdns1henkkqmoSJukqAWqHnPiN5iggRql/gy771VW212Ut6p/HuQVcgJ9HwEZjQVqQ8EGTcYw9a670RyQqhuSpP3QplCxHEM5qXWejNzhimWEs4Gkrg6g2CqS1gQywA5ha8QgFLBnLa15OkV1CRfF+IR264CtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MDVg3qoJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MDVg3qoJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C681DC2BCB0; Sun, 17 May 2026 10:05:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1779012362; bh=5ZcF1iuhgpZRaRKi7D1apExht7Ot8MG/oztV7oYXe9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MDVg3qoJmQolGF3qv8e+DTjWdIoPIuOIWrNd1h6lz/O2/q2QD3Ndnhv7vJkwowq+/ KwDTIwGleJ4Y8xgCiGxwq+VSeqSHKgxxdqBXC3KSOc+qKCfQ8s+YMCXEJKT0pN74gI ZqwJJzF4m2G0v7z0/DCYwIzI8x1KzEXCpPqfZ/I/EHzoSWR+XEw1m2y0g/k2rWOcyt tc5NPxuEptZgYNGsKKtrzf52ykxVaYwmwhu1udihj2IAjvN1g0xL3M6r+WXjvcGAxL atxCZ7VYsIRx7255P1PiReRzHSdlZ6YWyGEJ4DotKLTAbSg9TUD1FpuVF0OXNojurV ACCQoRblK2SCg== Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 12:05:56 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , debarbos@redhat.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Greg KH , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Guenter Roeck , sashiko-bot@kernel.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, sashiko@lists.linux.dev, Linux Kernel Workflows , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kfree@google.com Subject: Re: Stop false review statements Message-ID: <20260517120556.248852d8@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: <07602616-412B-4ED8-95D7-588C0D077EE3@linux.dev> References: <4f3d7f48-5766-425b-91f6-0acdb5554584@kernel.org> <07602616-412B-4ED8-95D7-588C0D077EE3@linux.dev> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 16 May 2026 14:59:44 -0700 Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On May 16, 2026, at 2:33=E2=80=AFPM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >=20 > > I find it opposite: clogging commits with useless information, because > > some arbitrary and completely closed-source tool did analysis means > > nothing to me one year later when I look at the commit in the Git histo= ry. =20 >=20 > This is simple not true: Sashiko is fully open-source, under Apache 2.0 l= icense > and the code belongs to LF.=20 > Yes, the instance behind sashiko.dev is using > Gemini 3.1 Pro LLM, which is not open-source, but it=E2=80=99s not a fund= amental limitation -=20 > Sashiko is supporting various LLMs, including open models - it=E2=80=99s = just a practical > choice: to my knowledge the quality of open models is not on par with fro= ntier closed > models=20 I would very much prefer using an open source LLM, even if not in pair=20 with latest paid models. > and it would require a non-trivial amount of hardware and infrastructure = to run > an open model at the required scale. IMHO the best would be to have them running on some infra that would accept open source models (*). If there aren't enough resources to have our own infra, there are offers out there which allows running open source models like https://ollama.com/pricing (I never used myself). (*) For instance, Qwen3.6 is brand new and licensed under apache-2.0. Not bad on my tests running it locally. Thanks, Mauro