From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay"
<devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 18:44:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517184434.71FE2C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517-ad9910-iio-driver-v5-5-31599c88314a@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `#clock-cells` property is missing from the `required` list and the `examples` section.
- [Low] The `interrupt-names` property lacks strict array item ordering.
- [Low] The `reset-gpios` property is missing a `maxItems: 1` constraint.
--
commit 873abe87012e16a8a1194f7d05ae22b3bea1a586
Author: Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@analog.com>
dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910
This commit adds device tree bindings for the Analog Devices AD9910 Direct
Digital Synthesizer. It includes properties for SPI, clocks, DAC current,
interrupts, and various GPIOs.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,ad9910.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,ad9910.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..5ab0db62dbf1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,ad9910.yaml
[ ... ]
> + interrupt-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + enum: [ drover, ram_swp_ovr ]
Should this use a list of const items instead of an enum? An enum allows the
array elements to appear in any order or contain duplicates. Using a list
with const constraints such as items: [ { const: drover },
{ const: ram_swp_ovr } ] would enforce the strict hardware mapping.
[ ... ]
> + reset-gpios:
> + description:
> + GPIOs controlling the Main Device reset.
> +
> + io-reset-gpios:
> + maxItems: 1
Does the reset-gpios property need a maxItems: 1 constraint? The description
mentions it controls the main device reset, but unlike the single-pin
io-reset-gpios property below it, it lacks this constraint.
[ ... ]
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - clocks
> + - dvdd-io33-supply
> + - avdd33-supply
> + - dvdd18-supply
> + - avdd18-supply
Since the device defines #clock-cells, should it be included in this
required list? Hardware with provider capabilities typically needs the
corresponding standard properties explicitly added to the required list.
[ ... ]
> + adi,pll-enable;
> + adi,charge-pump-current-microamp = <387>;
> + adi,refclk-out-drive-strength = "disabled";
> + output-range-microamp = <0 20070>;
> + };
> + };
Does the example node also need to include the #clock-cells property? To
ensure validation passes, the examples section generally needs to include
all required properties.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517-ad9910-iio-driver-v5-0-31599c88314a@analog.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 18:37 [PATCH v5 00/13] AD9910 Direct Digital Synthesizer Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] iio: core: validate file offset in iio_debugfs_write_reg() Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 19:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] iio: core: support 64-bit register through debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] iio: core: add hierarchical channel relationships Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] Documentation: ABI: testing: add parent entry for iio channels Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910 Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: initial driver implementation Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 19:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: add basic parallel port support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: add digital ramp generator support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: add RAM mode support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 19:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: add output shift keying support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] iio: frequency: ad9910: show channel priority in debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] Documentation: ABI: testing: add docs for ad9910 sysfs entries Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 19:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] docs: iio: add documentation for ad9910 driver Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-17 19:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517184434.71FE2C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox