From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821B03A962B; Mon, 18 May 2026 05:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779082315; cv=none; b=i8oHUn2QFFWCSMgae0fqRRFVtAz0BsC4PBoE3Q7gOgA/UFtmCNHe59b3ZiTwiVhVaw3LWWPDXV94J8zkbPu2vF/2eE4+5Qfpt5UJJu9MfI5vqSNCaG0L9mCkX61HO852Bjblq71KzpM3HqJL600HyqlujWGyBFOOPea9hxdOupY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779082315; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wSBv1BFWMwVdgkBPMo0C+dZxMuMebWrU53NFLkUEhAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GKGyfpbDJha64PQsny1fNVgHSTB6L0js8CtdvhxDe5KicqTpFcPEdCa9vYXUgeacdWUEkCBfeB24wu+xw25j5LlHLvqP64fTmPKQL6TGqOV6ffwdTuZsR5N4u3SvPLCmVL72ywBIpvyIhlIc/Yz9H7xEkcHwGPi5fKF99pvvM1I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=e8bF5Tut; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="e8bF5Tut" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF570C2BCB7; Mon, 18 May 2026 05:31:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1779082314; bh=wSBv1BFWMwVdgkBPMo0C+dZxMuMebWrU53NFLkUEhAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e8bF5TutASJW27gnqlPRKI6n1cKJYvtFzAKKc42Rvd5Q3X/H5PWctsr8RrqCp4LUP d47HMNFsLLh1Enhz6a11pUfIcsld1lR0ufVh8XfVm9iBejUHSwh8Vz2ol3ouAAIelL e6+nequ4fPqhMMQ9dg99DihuaUobZH63WYM28/Ak= Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 07:31:58 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Roman Gushchin , Krzysztof Kozlowski , debarbos@redhat.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Guenter Roeck , sashiko-bot@kernel.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, sashiko@lists.linux.dev, Linux Kernel Workflows , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kfree@google.com Subject: Re: Stop false review statements Message-ID: <2026051808-coil-blaspheme-8910@gregkh> References: <20260517183959.37441984@foz.lan> <20260517205606.3b035316@foz.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260517205606.3b035316@foz.lan> On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 08:56:06PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > By "reproduce locally", I didn't mean in strict sense. Sure, LLM answers > won't be identical, but I suspect that at least most of the major issues > on a patch series would be reported by any decent model. > > So, if we have something that one can locally run using its GPU, being > able to get an answer in the range of a couple of minutes per patch > should be enough to catch most of the issues. That should be possible now, you can submit a patch locally to the system. I have a "cheat-sheet" around here somewhere that explains how to do that, no idea why it's not part of the documentation. I can dig it up after breakfast... greg k-h