From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm: Switch to generic PAS TZ APIs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 07:34:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519073403.AC07AC2BCF5@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518072856.22790-11-sumit.garg@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Infinite probe deferral on devices that do not support PAS.
- [High] Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race leading to NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free.
--
commit 168f850440ba0271d11e8bfd4d88f6adbd042e93
Author: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/msm: Switch to generic PAS TZ APIs
This commit switches the drm/msm client drivers to use the generic PAS TZ
APIs instead of the SCM-specific ones. This allows the driver to support
multiple TrustZone implementation backends.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> index 66f80f2d12f95..6d68edf0578c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> @@ -146,10 +147,10 @@ static int zap_shader_load_mdt(struct msm_gpu *gpu, const char *fwname,
> goto out;
>
> /* Send the image to the secure world */
> - ret = qcom_scm_pas_auth_and_reset(pasid);
> + ret = qcom_pas_auth_and_reset(pasid);
Could this introduce a race condition if the PAS backend is unbound
concurrently?
Looking at the new generic PAS APIs, they do not appear to protect the backend
operations pointer:
drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_pas.c:qcom_pas_auth_and_reset() {
if (!ops_ptr)
return -ENODEV;
return ops_ptr->auth_and_reset(ops_ptr->dev, pas_id);
}
If a dynamic backend like qcom_pas_tee is unbound via sysfs between the check
and the dereference, ops_ptr could become NULL, leading to a NULL pointer
dereference.
Is there a mechanism preventing this race when switching from the SCM backend
to the generic PAS API?
[ ... ]
> @@ -175,9 +176,9 @@ int adreno_zap_shader_load(struct msm_gpu *gpu, u32 pasid)
> if (!zap_available)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - /* We need SCM to be able to load the firmware */
> - if (!qcom_scm_is_available()) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(&pdev->dev, "SCM is not available\n");
> + /* We need PAS to be able to load the firmware */
> + if (!qcom_pas_is_available()) {
> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(&pdev->dev, "Qcom PAS is not available\n");
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> }
Will this cause an infinite probe deferral on platforms that do not support
PAS hardware?
The SCM backend skips registering PAS ops if the hardware lacks PAS support.
If qcom_pas_is_available() is called on such a platform, it returns false
because no backend has registered.
Since this check happens before zap_shader_load_mdt() parses the device tree
to determine if a zap shader is actually needed (which is what updates the
zap_available flag), won't the GPU probe indefinitely defer instead of
failing gracefully?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260518072856.22790-1-sumit.garg@kernel.org?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 7:28 [PATCH v6 00/16] firmware: qcom: Add OP-TEE PAS service support Sumit Garg
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: Add EL2 overlay Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] firmware: qcom: Add a generic PAS service Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] firmware: qcom_scm: Migrate to " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] firmware: qcom: Add a PAS TEE service Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Switch over to generic PAS TZ APIs Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Switch " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] soc: qcom: mdtloader: " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] remoteproc: qcom: Select QCOM_PAS generic service Sumit Garg
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm: Switch to generic PAS TZ APIs Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] media: qcom: " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] media: qcom: Pass proper PAS ID to set_remote_state API Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] net: ipa: Switch to generic PAS TZ APIs Sumit Garg
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] wifi: ath12k: " Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 7:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] firmware: qcom_scm: Remove SCM PAS wrappers Sumit Garg
2026-05-18 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer entry for Qualcomm PAS TZ service Sumit Garg
2026-05-19 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] firmware: qcom: Add OP-TEE PAS service support Vignesh Viswanathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519073403.AC07AC2BCF5@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox