From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] i2c: mt7621: limit SCL_STRETCH only to Mediatek SoC
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 23:45:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519234557.8BB3F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519223253.1093-5-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Dynamic evaluation of `device_is_compatible()` in `mtk_i2c_reset()` causes a sleep-in-atomic bug.
- [High] The hardware reset routine acquires a mutex while executing in atomic context.
--
commit 5cf3b78e15e95214810bba784c999fc11f06780f
Author: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
i2c: mt7621: limit SCL_STRETCH only to Mediatek SoC
This commit introduces a new compatible string for Airoha SoCs and limits
the SCL_STRETCH feature to Mediatek devices. It enforces this by checking
the compatible string during the I2C reset routine.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt7621.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt7621.c
> index d8fa29e7e0fa3..3cde43c57a2bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt7621.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt7621.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_wait_idle(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, bool atomic)
>
> static void mtk_i2c_reset(struct mtk_i2c *i2c)
> {
> + u32 reg;
> int ret;
>
> ret = device_reset(i2c->adap.dev.parent);
[Severity: High]
Does this device_reset() call sleep in atomic context?
When an I2C transfer times out during mtk_i2c_xfer_atomic(), the driver
branches to err_timeout and calls mtk_i2c_reset(). This reset routine calls
device_reset(), which eventually invokes __reset_control_get(). That
function unconditionally acquires the reset_list_mutex.
Acquiring a mutex in atomic context (such as during panic or reboot, when
mtk_i2c_xfer_atomic() is used) triggers a 'schedule while atomic' bug and
causes a kernel panic. Commit "i2c: mt7621: rework cmd/wait OPs to support
atomic afer variant" (Patch 1 of this series) directly exposed this sleeping
reset path to atomic execution contexts.
> if (ret)
> dev_err(i2c->dev, "I2C reset failed!\n");
>
> @@ -98,8 +99,12 @@ static void mtk_i2c_reset(struct mtk_i2c *i2c)
> * Don't set SM0CTL0_ODRAIN as its bit meaning is inverted. To
> * configure open-drain mode, this bit needs to be cleared.
> */
> - iowrite32(((i2c->clk_div << 16) & SM0CTL0_CLK_DIV_MASK) | SM0CTL0_EN |
> - SM0CTL0_SCL_STRETCH, i2c->base + REG_SM0CTL0_REG);
> + reg = ((i2c->clk_div << 16) & SM0CTL0_CLK_DIV_MASK) | SM0CTL0_EN;
> + /* Set SCL_STRETCH only for Mediatek SoC */
> + if (device_is_compatible(i2c->dev, "mediatek,mt7621-i2c"))
[Severity: High]
Does evaluating device_is_compatible() here cause a sleep-in-atomic bug?
The mtk_i2c_reset() function is called from the I2C transfer timeout handler,
which runs in an atomic context when the driver executes mtk_i2c_xfer_atomic().
The device_is_compatible() function internally invokes
fwnode_property_match_string(), which unconditionally allocates memory using
kcalloc() with GFP_KERNEL. Allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL in atomic
context blocks and triggers a 'schedule while atomic' kernel panic.
Should the driver parse the compatible properties once during probe() and
cache the configuration (e.g., as a has_scl_stretch boolean) in struct mtk_i2c
instead?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519223253.1093-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 22:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] i2c: mt7621: improve support for Airoha Christian Marangi
2026-05-19 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: mt7621: rework cmd/wait OPs to support atomic afer variant Christian Marangi
2026-05-19 22:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] i2c: mt7621: clear pending interrupt on i2c reset Christian Marangi
2026-05-19 23:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: i2c: mt7621: Document an7581 compatible Christian Marangi
2026-05-19 23:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 15:49 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-19 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] i2c: mt7621: limit SCL_STRETCH only to Mediatek SoC Christian Marangi
2026-05-19 23:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-19 22:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] i2c: mt7621: make device reset optional Christian Marangi
2026-05-20 0:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 9:41 ` Benjamin Larsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519234557.8BB3F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox