Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 07/10] net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices for a single FE GDM port
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 08:59:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520085933.35D171F00897@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-v8-7-6bd70e329df6@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Port-wide hardware configuration is improperly modified via per-net_device callbacks, breaking the newly introduced 1:N relationship.
- [High] Sequential initialization of multiple net_devices sharing a GDM port silently overwrites singleton hardware loopback and WAN configuration registers.
--

commit d922e17d3b113696fc139ac4b2b3ef81e2b9ad50
Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices for a single FE GDM port

This commit introduces support for multiple net_devices connected to the
same Frame Engine (FE) GDM port (GDM3 or GDM4) via an external hw arbiter.
It updates the airoha_gdm_port structure to hold an array of devices instead
of a single device.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> index fbb50dc73af84..fc49f0049983e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -540,19 +541,20 @@ struct airoha_qdma {
>  struct airoha_gdm_dev {
>  	struct airoha_gdm_port *port;
>  	struct airoha_qdma *qdma;
> -	struct net_device *dev;
>  	struct airoha_eth *eth;
> +	struct net_device *dev;
>  
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(qos_sq_bmap, AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS);
>  	/* qos stats counters */
>  	u64 cpu_tx_packets;
>  	u64 fwd_tx_packets;
> +
> +	int nbq;
>  };
>  
>  struct airoha_gdm_port {
> -	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev;
> +	struct airoha_gdm_dev *devs[AIROHA_MAX_NUM_GDM_DEVS];
>  	int id;
> -	int nbq;

This introduces a 1:N relationship between a GDM port and net_devices, but
are the net_device lifecycle and MTU callbacks updated to account for shared
ports?

Looking at airoha_dev_stop(), the driver unconditionally drops all traffic
for the port:

airoha_dev_stop()
    airoha_set_gdm_port_fwd_cfg(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_FWD_CFG(port->id), FE_PSE_PORT_DROP);
    
Since this modifies the forwarding configuration for the entire GDM port,
does stopping just one net_device silently drop all traffic for the port,
breaking any other active net_devices sharing it?

Similarly, airoha_dev_change_mtu() overwrites port-wide hardware registers
such as REG_GDM_LEN_CFG. Could this lower the port MTU while another device
still requires a larger MTU?

I note this regression is addressed later in the series by commit
646f1e7bb6021 (net: airoha: Do not stop GDM port if it is shared).

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> index 27b214ce2a4ed..8d36ab6cd7854 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1830,7 +1831,7 @@ static int airoha_set_gdm2_loopback(struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev)
>  	airoha_fe_clear(eth, REG_FE_VIP_PORT_EN, BIT(AIROHA_GDM2_IDX));
>  	airoha_fe_clear(eth, REG_FE_IFC_PORT_EN, BIT(AIROHA_GDM2_IDX));
>  
> -	src_port = eth->soc->ops.get_sport(port, port->nbq);
> +	src_port = eth->soc->ops.get_sport(port, dev->nbq);
>  	if (src_port < 0)
>  		return src_port;
>  

When multiple net_devices sharing a GDM port are sequentially initialized
via ndo_init (airoha_dev_init()), they unconditionally call
airoha_set_gdm2_loopback().

Inside this function, global singleton hardware registers are modified:

airoha_set_gdm2_loopback()
    airoha_fe_rmw(eth, REG_FE_WAN_PORT,
                  WAN1_EN_MASK | WAN1_MASK | WAN0_MASK,
                  FIELD_PREP(WAN0_MASK, src_port));

Does initializing the second device on the same port silently overwrite
the hardware loopback and WAN configuration of the previously initialized
device?

I see this regression is resolved later in the series by commit
8a565b44990bb (net: airoha: Introduce WAN device flag).

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-v8-0-6bd70e329df6@kernel.org?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19  8:57 [PATCH net-next v8 00/10] net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices connected to the same GDM port Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 01/10] dt-bindings: net: airoha: Add GDM port ethernet child node Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 02/10] net: airoha: Introduce airoha_gdm_dev struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20  8:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 12:25     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 03/10] net: airoha: Move airoha_qdma pointer in " Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 04/10] net: airoha: Rely on airoha_gdm_dev pointer in airoha_is_lan_gdm_port() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 05/10] net: airoha: Move qos_sq_bmap in airoha_gdm_dev struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20  8:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 12:24     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 06/10] net: airoha: Move {cpu,fwd}_tx_packets " Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 07/10] net: airoha: Support multiple net_devices for a single FE GDM port Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20  8:59   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-20 12:28     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20 12:33     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 08/10] net: airoha: Do not stop GDM port if it is shared Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 09/10] net: airoha: Introduce WAN device flag Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20  8:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 12:46     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-19  8:57 ` [PATCH net-next v8 10/10] net: airoha: Support multiple LAN/WAN interfaces for hw MAC address configuration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-05-20  8:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 12:49     ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260520085933.35D171F00897@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox