From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rustam Adilov" <adilov@disroot.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] phy: realtek: usb2: add support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 19:51:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520195159.578AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520175728.720877-6-adilov@disroot.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing error handling for of_iomap() leads to NULL pointer dereference
- [High] Incorrect pointer arithmetic on void __iomem * causes unaligned memory accesses
- [High] Resource leak of I/O memory mappings
--
commit 45e50610a9cf3e4d1ba9824c0450199938805d5b
Author: Rustam Adilov <adilov@disroot.org>
phy: realtek: usb2: add support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY
This commit adds support for the USB2 PHY of RTL9607C-based SoCs. It includes
macros, a PHY config structure, and logic to clear a "force host disconnect"
bit before writing parameters.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
> index 16c5fc3191dec..69f0f5279b5ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -600,6 +617,19 @@ static int do_rtk_phy_init(struct rtk_phy *rtk_phy, int index)
> goto do_toggle;
> }
>
> + if (phy_cfg->force_host_disconnect) {
> + /* disable force-host-disconnect */
> + void __iomem *vstatus = phy_reg->reg_wrap_vstatus;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + temp = phy_reg->read(vstatus + PHY_9607_FORCE_DISCONNECT_REG);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but missing error handling for
of_iomap() in parse_phy_data() could lead to a NULL pointer dereference here.
drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c:parse_phy_data() {
...
phy_parameter->phy_reg.reg_wrap_vstatus = of_iomap(np, 0);
phy_parameter->phy_reg.reg_gusb2phyacc0 = of_iomap(np, 1) + index;
...
}
If the mapping fails, phy_reg->reg_wrap_vstatus will be NULL.
Does this new code risk dereferencing a NULL vstatus pointer if the device
tree is invalid or memory is exhausted?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the driver leak the I/O memory mapped
by of_iomap()?
Since devm_of_iomap() is not used and there are no corresponding iounmap()
calls anywhere in the driver, could this exhaust I/O memory upon probe
failure or driver unbinding?
> +
> + temp &= ~PHY_9607_FORCE_DISCONNECT_BIT;
> + phy_reg->write(temp, vstatus + PHY_9607_FORCE_DISCONNECT_REG);
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> + }
> +
> /* Set page 0 */
> phy_data_page = phy_cfg->page0;
> rtk_phy_set_page(phy_reg, 0);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1374,6 +1404,33 @@ static const struct phy_cfg rtd1315e_phy_cfg = {
> .write = rtk_usb2phy_write,
> };
>
> +static const struct phy_cfg rtl9607_phy_cfg = {
> + .page0_size = MAX_USB_PHY_PAGE0_DATA_SIZE,
> + .page0 = { [0] = {0xe0, 0x95},
> + [4] = {0xe4, 0x6a},
> + [12] = {0xf3, 0x31}, },
> + .page1_size = MAX_USB_PHY_PAGE1_DATA_SIZE,
> + .page1 = { [0] = {0xe0, 0x26}, },
> + .page2_size = MAX_USB_PHY_PAGE2_DATA_SIZE,
> + .page2 = { [7] = {0xe7, 0x33}, },
> + .num_phy = 1,
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the pointer arithmetic
incorrectly misalign the base pointer when num_phy > 1?
drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c:parse_phy_data() {
...
for (index = 0; index < rtk_phy->num_phy; index++) {
...
phy_parameter->phy_reg.reg_gusb2phyacc0 = of_iomap(np, 1) + index;
...
}
Since of_iomap() returns a void __iomem *, adding index increments the
pointer by exactly index bytes.
Could this cause an unaligned memory access exception (leading to a kernel
panic) or fail to map the correct register index from the device tree?
> + .check_efuse_version = CHECK_EFUSE_V2,
> + .efuse_dc_driving_rate = EFUS_USB_DC_CAL_RATE,
> + .dc_driving_mask = 0x1f,
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260520175728.720877-1-adilov@disroot.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 17:57 [PATCH v6 0/6] phy: realtek: usb2: support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce vstatus/new_reg_req variables to driver data Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce read and write functions " Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: realtek,usb2phy.yaml: extend for resets and RTL9607C support Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce reset controller struct Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] phy: realtek: usb2: add support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY Rustam Adilov
2026-05-20 19:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-20 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] phy: realtek: Make configs available for MACH_REALTEK_RTL Rustam Adilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520195159.578AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=adilov@disroot.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox