Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Josua Mayer" <josua@solid-run.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a-rev2: extend 32-bit, and add 64-bit pci regions
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 15:13:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260524151347.BD92A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260524-lx2160-pci-v7-1-09370c23b952@solid-run.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Expanding the 32-bit PCI outbound window to 3GB causes it to overlap with the inbound system memory address space, breaking DMA.
- [High] The introduction of the 64-bit PCI memory range causes existing U-Boot bootloaders to fail device tree patching, breaking MSI and IOMMU.
--

commit a80e2e3f97808fdad781240469c5e07e019191e9
Author: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>

arm64: dts: lx2160a-rev2: extend 32-bit, and add 64-bit pci regions

This commit extends the 32-bit PCIe memory regions to 3GB and adds 64-bit
PCIe memory regions for LX2160A rev2. This allows allocation of large BARs
requested by graphics processors or AI accelerators.

> [4] pci bootloaderp atching related errors with IORESOURCE_MEM_64 flag:
> [    0.967809] layerscape-pcie 3800000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@3800000 ranges:
> [    0.967830] layerscape-pcie 3800000.pcie:      MEM 0xa400000000..0xa7ffffffff -> 0xa400000000
> [    0.967842] layerscape-pcie 3800000.pcie:      MEM 0xa040000000..0xa0ffffffff -> 0x0040000000
> [    0.967849] layerscape-pcie 3800000.pcie:       IO 0xa000010000..0xa00001ffff -> 0x0000000000
> [    1.169315] pci 0000:01:00.0: [8086:1572] type 00 class 0x020000 PCIe Endpoint
> [    1.169733] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x00ffffff 64bit pref]
> [    1.169771] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 3 [mem 0x00000000-0x00007fff 64bit pref]
> [    1.169796] pci 0000:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0007ffff pref]
> [    1.173389] OF: /soc/pcie@3800000: no msi-map translation for id 0x100 on (null)
> [    1.173515] OF: /soc/pcie@3800000: no iommu-map translation for id 0x100 on (null)

[Severity: High]
Does adding the 64-bit PCI memory range cause existing U-Boot bootloaders to
fail device tree patching?

When U-Boot encounters the 64-bit range, it appears fdt_fixup_pcie() aborts
and fails to append the msi-map and iommu-map properties.

Without iommu-map, the kernel will not attach the SMMU to the PCIe devices.
Without msi-map, the kernel cannot translate PCIe Requester IDs to ITS
Device IDs, which breaks MSI/MSI-X allocations.

Could this prevent devices like NVMe drives from initializing and break
compatibility with existing deployed bootloaders?

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-rev2.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-rev2.dtsi
> index f54005e37924b..db1ebee53f6f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-rev2.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-rev2.dtsi
> @@ -14,8 +14,9 @@ &pcie1 {
>  	      0x80 0x00000000 0x0 0x00002000>; /* configuration space */
>  	reg-names = "regs", "config";
>  
> -	ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x80 0x00010000 0x0 0x00010000
> -		  0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x80 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
> +	ranges = <0x81000000 0x00 0x00000000 0x80 0x00010000 0x00 0x00010000>, /* 16-Bit IO Window */
> +		 <0x82000000 0x00 0x40000000 0x80 0x40000000 0x00 0xc0000000>, /* 32-Bit - non-prefetchable */
> +		 <0xC3000000 0x84 0x00000000 0x84 0x00000000 0x04 0x00000000>; /* 64-Bit - prefetchable - 16GB */

[Severity: High]
Does expanding the 32-bit PCI outbound window to 3GB (0xc0000000) cause it to
overlap with inbound system memory?

System memory starts at physical address 0x80000000. Since there isn't a
dma-ranges property mapping inbound DMA to a different bus address, system
memory uses a 1:1 mapping, meaning inbound DMA targets 0x80000000 and above.

If a PCIe device requests a large 32-bit BAR, the kernel might allocate it
within this 0x40000000-0xffffffff range. This causes the Root Port's
downstream bridge Memory Limit register to be programmed to a value >=
0x80000000.

A Root Port won't forward upstream memory transactions if the address falls
within its programmed downstream window, as it assumes it is peer-to-peer
traffic.

Could this intercept endpoint DMA targeting system memory in the overlapped
range and cause system hangs?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260524-lx2160-pci-v7-0-09370c23b952@solid-run.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-24 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-24 14:54 [PATCH v7 0/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a: cleanups, add new board, large pci bars Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a-rev2: extend 32-bit, and add 64-bit pci regions Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 15:03   ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 15:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-24 17:12     ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] arm64: dts: lx2162a-clearfog: use rev2 SoC dtsi Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] arm64: dts: lx2162a-clearfog: cleanup superfluous status properties Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] arm64: dts: lx2162a-clearfog: specify sfp ports led colour and function Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add solidrun lx2160a twins board Josua Mayer
2026-05-26  9:15   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a-clearfog-itx: remove redundant dts version tag Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a-clearfog-itx: move shared includes to dts Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a-cex7: add usb hub Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] arm64: dts: Add support for LX2160 Twins board in single configuration Josua Mayer
2026-05-24 16:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-24 17:10     ` Josua Mayer
2026-06-01 20:31 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] arm64: dts: lx2160a: cleanups, add new board, large pci bars Frank.Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260524151347.BD92A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=josua@solid-run.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox