On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 02:56:54PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 06:10:30PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 08:15:07PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > Add a schema for the 10G Lynx SerDes. This is very similar to the modern > > > form of the 28G Lynx SerDes, which is very much the intention. > > > > > > We allow both forms of #phy-cells = <1> in the top-level provider > > > and #phy-cells = <0> in the per-lane provider for more flexibility to > > > consumers, and because the kernel code is shared with the 28G Lynx which > > > already has that support for compatibility reasons. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean > > > --- > > > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: Conor Dooley > > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > Cc: Rob Herring > > > > > > v1->v2: > > > - move patch later in series, right before driver > > > - deliberately ignoring this Sashiko feedback: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20260529125017.ifqunh52gdzhthdg@skbuf/ > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..993f076bba4e > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: Freescale Lynx 10G SerDes PHY > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Vladimir Oltean > > > + > > > +description: > > > + The 10G Lynx is a multi-protocol SerDes block which handles networking, PCIe, > > > + SATA and other high-speed interfaces. It is present on most QorIQ and > > > + Layerscape SoCs. The register map is common, but the integration is > > > + SoC-specific, with the differences consisting in register endianness, the > > > + number of lanes, protocol converters available per lane and their location in > > > + the PCCR registers. Some SoCs have multiple SerDes blocks and those differ in > > > + their protocol capabilities per lane. > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + description: > > > + There is intentionally no generic fsl,lynx-10g compatible string due to > > > + the hardware inability to report its capabilities, despite having a > > > + common register map. > > > > I think you can probably drop this from the diff, and put it in the > > commit message. > > Ok. > > > > + enum: > > > + - fsl,ls1028a-serdes > > > + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes1 > > > + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes2 > > > + - fsl,ls1088a-serdes1 > > > + - fsl,ls1088a-serdes2 > > > + - fsl,ls2088a-serdes1 > > > + - fsl,ls2088a-serdes2 > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + big-endian: true > > > > This isn't a required property, but should it be made required for the > > specific compatibles that are big endian? Or are we not that lucky, and > > devices can be either? > > I can make big-endian a required property for fsl,ls1046a-serdes1 and > fsl,ls1046a-serdes2. Please do. In that case, pw-bot: changes-requested Cheers, Conor.