From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 23:11:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603231124.C719F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603-ks8995-to-ksz8-v4-5-e15149ef21e7@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] NET_DSA_KS8995 selects NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI without inheriting its required dependencies.
- [High] The transitional Kconfig option lacks a prompt and is defined as a `bool`, completely breaking the intended user migration.
--
commit b05792c06b27a646be1067e3e5c2643b8b180f96
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver
This commit deletes the old ks8995 switch driver and replaces it with a
Kconfig stub. The stub is intended to transition users to the superseding
NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI driver automatically during config migration.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig b/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
> index e704ab702c189..6a704b6383ffd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
> @@ -98,13 +98,13 @@ config NET_DSA_RZN1_A5PSW
> RZ/N1 SoC.
>
> config NET_DSA_KS8995
> - tristate "Micrel KS8995 family 5-ports 10/100 Ethernet switches"
> - depends on SPI
> - depends on !NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI
> - select NET_DSA_TAG_NONE
> + bool
[Severity: High]
The commit message states this is a stub to automatically phase users
over to the new symbol when migrating their configs. However, without a
prompt string like bool "Transitional...", doesn't this become a hidden
symbol?
It looks like Kconfig will silently drop the old CONFIG_NET_DSA_KS8995
setting during make oldconfig rather than preserving the user's
selection, which would fail to migrate them to the new driver.
> + select NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI
[Severity: High]
Will selecting NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI without inheriting its
dependencies cause unmet direct dependency warnings?
NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI depends on NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_COMMON and
SPI, but these dependencies are not listed here. Could this lead to
build failures on configurations where the dependencies are not met?
> help
> - This driver supports the Micrel KS8995 family of 10/100 Mbit ethernet
> - switches, managed over SPI.
> + This is a transitional option for users who had NET_DSA_KS8995
> + enabled. It automatically enables the new NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI
> + driver which supersedes it. This option will be removed in a future
> + kernel release.
>
> config NET_DSA_SMSC_LAN9303
> tristate
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-ks8995-to-ksz8-v4-0-e15149ef21e7@kernel.org?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 23:10 [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for KSZ8995XA/KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-06-02 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/5] net: dsa: microchip: Add fallback Micrel compatibles Linus Walleij
2026-06-03 23:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 7:42 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-02 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-06-02 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] net: dsa: tag_ks8995: Add the KS8995 tag handling Linus Walleij
2026-06-03 23:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-06-03 23:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 8:09 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-02 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver Linus Walleij
2026-06-03 23:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603231124.C719F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox