From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Midgy BALON <midgy971@gmail.com>,
conor+dt@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 7/9] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core: Add RK3568
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 17:55:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604-disparate-encircle-2de02c0885d0@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604140850.C56C21F00899@smtp.kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10212 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 02:08:50PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 6 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> New issues:
> - [High] The value written to `RK_MMU_AUTO_GATING` sets bit 1 instead of clearing it, contradicting the inline comment and hardware workaround logic.
> - [High] The error handling path for `noc_init()` failure leaks the IOMMU group reference and leaves the device in an unbalanced PM runtime state.
> - [High] A malformed device tree with excessive NPU core nodes triggers an out-of-bounds write in `rocket_probe()` array access.
> - [High] The NOC bus de-idle sequence via the PMU is missing from the runtime PM resume path.
> - [Medium] The `rockchip,pmu` property is functionally mandatory for RK3568 but is not added to the schema's conditional `required` list.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] The clock names in the `core->clks` array are uninitialized before being passed to `devm_clk_bulk_get()`, causing the framework to fetch the wrong clocks.
> --
>
> commit 6c61da961bed3360a99f625d4a3b1599e7bfe685
> Author: Midgy BALON <midgy971@gmail.com>
>
> dt-bindings: npu: rockchip, rk3588-rknn-core: Add RK3568
>
> The RK3568 carries a single core of the same NVDLA-derived NPU IP as the
> RK3588. Add its compatible. On RK3568 the NPU NOC bus-idle and power
> gating are controlled through the system PMU rather than a dedicated
> register block.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
> > index caca2a4903cd1..af9936b32e9fe 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/npu/rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core.yaml
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -75,7 +83,15 @@ required:
> > - resets
> > - reset-names
> > - npu-supply
> > - - sram-supply
> > +
> > +if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core
> > +then:
> > + required:
> > + - sram-supply
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does the missing rockchip,pmu property from the conditional required block
> cause incomplete device trees to pass validation?
>
> The rockchip,pmu property is functionally mandatory for the
> rockchip,rk3568-rknn-core variant as the driver unconditionally fails to probe
> without it. Missing this mandatory property here could allow invalid device
> trees to go undetected.
This looks valid. Additionally, the condition should forbid this
property on rk3588.
pw-bot: changes-requested
>
> > additionalProperties: false
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
Why is the bot commenting on driver stuff here?
Cheers,
Conor.
> > index b3b2fa9ba645a..634f78dfe2887 100644
> > --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -83,6 +89,15 @@ int rocket_core_init(struct rocket_core *core)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > + if (core->soc_data->noc_init) {
> > + err = core->soc_data->noc_init(core);
> > + if (err) {
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> > + rocket_job_fini(core);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this error path leak the IOMMU group reference and leave the device in an
> unbalanced PM runtime state?
>
> By returning directly after pm_runtime_put_sync() and rocket_job_fini(), the
> code misses calling rocket_core_fini() which handles iommu_group_put(),
> pm_runtime_disable(), and pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend().
>
> > +
> > version = rocket_pc_readl(core, VERSION);
> > version += rocket_pc_readl(core, VERSION_NUM) & 0xffff;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> > index 46e6ee1e72c5f..6186f4faa3a2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -27,17 +25,14 @@ struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > ddev = &rdev->ddev;
> > dev_set_drvdata(dev, rdev);
> >
> > - for_each_compatible_node(core_node, NULL, "rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core")
> > - if (of_device_is_available(core_node))
> > - num_cores++;
> > -
> > - rdev->cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_cores, sizeof(*rdev->cores), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + rdev->cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, soc_data->num_cores, sizeof(*rdev->cores),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Can this code overflow rdev->cores[] if the device tree contains more NPU
> nodes than soc_data->num_cores?
>
> With this change, the array size is fixed to soc_data->num_cores, but
> rocket_probe() in drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c is still called for every
> matching node. If there are too many nodes in the device tree, it appears
> rocket_probe() will write out of bounds here:
>
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c:rocket_probe() {
> ...
> unsigned int core = rdev->num_cores;
> ...
> rdev->cores[core].rdev = rdev;
> rdev->cores[core].dev = &pdev->dev;
> rdev->cores[core].index = core;
> ...
> }
>
> > if (!rdev->cores)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> > index 8bbbce594883e..5a72d0b5f4dff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -213,8 +219,64 @@ static void rocket_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * On RK3568 the NPU NOC bus is gated and idle out of reset and must be
> > + * powered on and de-idled through the PMU before the NPU is reachable. PMU
> > + * registers use a write-mask protocol: the upper 16 bits enable writes to the
> > + * matching lower 16 bits.
> > + *
> > + * The NPU's high-speed clock is a PVTPLL managed by TF-A via SCMI and must be
> > + * running before the NOC acknowledges the de-idle request. Force a real SCMI
> > + * rate change (an intermediate rate defeats the clock framework's
> > + * unchanged-rate shortcut) now that the power domain is on and clocks enabled.
> > + */
> > +#define ROCKET_RK3568_SCMI_CLK 2
> > +
> > +static int rk3568_noc_init(struct rocket_core *core)
> > +{
> > + struct regmap *pmu;
> > + unsigned int val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + clk_set_rate(core->clks[ROCKET_RK3568_SCMI_CLK].clk, 600000000UL);
> > + clk_set_rate(core->clks[ROCKET_RK3568_SCMI_CLK].clk, 1000000000UL);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does this unintentionally alter the system
> aclk rate?
>
> Looking at rocket_core_init(), the core->clks array is passed to
> devm_clk_bulk_get() without initializing the id strings:
>
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c:rocket_core_init() {
> ...
> err = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(core->clks), core->clks);
> ...
> }
>
> Because the id fields are NULL, the framework fetches the first DT clock
> (aclk) for all elements. Calling clk_set_rate() here seems to alter the
> system aclk frequency instead of the intended SCMI clock.
>
> > +
> > + pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(core->dev->of_node, "rockchip,pmu");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pmu))
> > + return dev_err_probe(core->dev, PTR_ERR(pmu),
> > + "failed to get PMU regmap\n");
> > +
> > + /* Power on the NPU power domain (PWR_GATE_SFTCON bit 1 = 0). */
> > + regmap_write(pmu, 0xa0, BIT(1 + 16));
> > +
> > + /* Disable NPU NOC auto-idle (NOC_AUTO_CON0 bit 2). */
> > + regmap_write(pmu, 0x70, BIT(2 + 16));
> > +
> > + /* Request NPU bus de-idle (BUS_IDLE_SFTCON0 bit 2 = 0). */
> > + regmap_write(pmu, 0x50, BIT(2 + 16));
> > +
> > + /* Wait for the bus to report active (BUS_IDLE_ST bit 2 = 0). */
> > + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pmu, 0x68, val, !(val & BIT(2)), 10, 1000);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(core->dev, "timed out waiting for NPU bus de-idle\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> [Severity: High]
> Is a NOC bus de-idle sequence required in the runtime PM resume path as well?
>
> If the generic power domain (genpd) powers off the NPU during runtime suspend,
> the NOC bus idle state would reset. Currently, rocket_device_runtime_resume()
> enables clocks but doesn't repeat this PMU de-idle sequence, which could leave
> the AXI bus gated and cause subsequent hardware accesses to hang or crash.
>
> > +
> > static const struct rocket_soc_data rk3568_soc_data = {
> > .num_cores = 1,
> > .dma_bits = 32,
> > .noc_init = rk3568_noc_init,
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> > index 0013cf196c573..7d40ecb26123f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> > @@ -952,6 +952,18 @@ static int rk_iommu_enable(struct rk_iommu *iommu)
> >
> > ret = rk_iommu_enable_paging(iommu);
> >
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + /*
> > + * RK356x v1 IOMMU: RK_MMU_AUTO_GATING bit 1 enables page-walker
> > + * auto clock-gating; the walker's AXI master then loses its clock
> > + * between transactions and a TLB-miss page walk never completes,
> > + * leaving the IOMMU stuck (PAGING_ENABLED, never IDLE). Clear
> > + * bit 1 (keep bit 0, the slave-port gate) once paging is enabled.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++)
> > + rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_AUTO_GATING, 0x2);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Will this write operation inadvertently set bit 1 instead of clearing it?
>
> Writing 0x2 (binary 10) sets bit 1 and clears bit 0, which contradicts the
> inline comment indicating that bit 1 should be cleared and bit 0 kept. This
> appears to enable the buggy page-walker auto clock-gating and disable the
> slave-port gate.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > out_disable_stall:
> > rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu);
> > out_disable_clocks:
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604135255.62682-1-midgy971@gmail.com?part=7
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 13:52 [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] accel: rocket: Add RK3568 NPU support Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/9] accel: rocket: Introduce per-SoC rocket_soc_data Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] accel: rocket: Derive DMA width and core count from match data Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/9] accel: rocket: Add RK3568 SoC support Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/9] accel: rocket: Reset the NPU before detaching the IOMMU on timeout Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/9] accel: rocket: Keep the IOMMU domain attached across jobs Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] iommu/rockchip: Clear AUTO_GATING bit 1 on the RK356x v1 IOMMU Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 14:20 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2026-06-05 1:59 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-07 21:05 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-08 1:45 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-08 3:40 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-07-09 0:15 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/9] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core: Add RK3568 Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 16:55 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add the NPU and its IOMMU Midgy BALON
2026-06-04 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568-rock-3b: Enable the NPU Midgy BALON
2026-06-05 1:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] accel: rocket: Add RK3568 NPU support Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-07 21:03 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-08 1:40 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-08 8:05 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-08 9:14 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-08 9:38 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-09 11:11 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-10 1:14 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-06-10 10:05 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-06-10 13:38 ` Midgy Balon
2026-06-10 14:28 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-06-12 21:15 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604-disparate-encircle-2de02c0885d0@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=midgy971@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox