From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91F83E024D; Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780563971; cv=none; b=ofOX+cFjI4+HCxgTltgBPiOwfY6rG0L+BfW/H3UVYGHh0zxPQRIjLuCKCM8vhNvGr2buUN6FxhegGAST41YHIC8W5UZQY+ivv3H+Z674rcWoHyF+k/KOG5n/XTKvlN0uQl6LChgV27fi4P/Glx77Joa7/aOyPC6pm/sV38KiXyc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780563971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I2BuAk6w1fvciNoxHKm+FqjPnZEQcb4D7gEkF0i5EJA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eaJao4PIrBcFmJMVkficvVTeRn597+yG/VMWGKuBCOrPg32QmHaWXWgm/HGXr7DuOgdwbQTUfHx3l1NSEop+aU/1NfUvmN3d2mVUgCmgfKTWReC9VeduvFyflTWtgUsXi/FCXA9H9mplvQQcNDQVZgQeVEzUurkDM3CoRQ7diaU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T42jBbJV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T42jBbJV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 000B21F00893; Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:06:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780563970; bh=I2BuAk6w1fvciNoxHKm+FqjPnZEQcb4D7gEkF0i5EJA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=T42jBbJV5BU+QB43XV/oRSh3o5QLfBMbtBjajHM4SnRYfxXaXiqEnsGNtrSGVCb30 HB+w7wQHCuIP2VacjXflOW8ox/5kzPF9ypRw1/COVE98fxnEh8TxnxvXo4Ax0hlBOt ijG+avW5+9z3wsnGFlyAwhCIt4rGaYQBwAzfYNyLITz0V0i2flJ+525RCHAZhpBtbs c92DjoExM3jUCIKX93H3v6OxFKsivXQFIYgldcDVkeWHbqQS9bfVl8Ox3NAL+JP4ME PKry2yLMJz/pmnaXhhJEgPZfbA4wT/xoTqOgbfXttUN8nPsbxFvruuO5qXlk4NlOGy fpnT1NgDLrJew== Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 10:06:07 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Guodong Xu Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Zic64b extension description Message-ID: <20260604-mating-multiple-458aafa93791@spud> References: <20260603-rva23u64-hwprobe-v2-v3-7-5529a7b28384@gmail.com> <20260602232859.3494A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YLEgTo6BKmXMajGs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --YLEgTo6BKmXMajGs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 01:23:24PM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote: > Hi Rob, Conor, >=20 > On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 7:29=E2=80=AFAM wrote: > > > > The properties block requires multi-letter extensions to be sorted > > alphanumerically. Because '6' comes before 'c', would it be more accura= te to > > place zic64b before ziccamoa? >=20 > On a double check, I found here Sashiko is flagging a real ordering issue. > (Although it exists before my submission.) >=20 > In current riscv/extensions.yaml, zic* entries are split into two groups: > one (ziccamoa etc.) sits above the Zk* block, the other (zicbom, zimop, > etc.) sits below it. This is wrong considering the rule says "# multi-let= ter > extensions, sorted alphanumerically". >=20 > Would you like a standalone patch that re-sorts the zi*/zk* ordering > properly? It's purely cosmetic. Please. >=20 > If there are no objections I can send it as part of my v4. > Let me know what you think. >=20 > BR, > Guodong >=20 > > > > Does it make sense to place zic64b in its strictly correct alphanumeric > > position, rather than continuing the out-of-order grouping of the exist= ing > > cache-block extensions like zicbom? > > > > [ ... ] > > > > -- > > Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-rva23u= 64-hwprobe-v2-v3-0-5529a7b28384@gmail.com?part=3D7 --YLEgTo6BKmXMajGs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaiE//gAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0p5yAQCwPebcWoF5lul1ddE3nY4JN/yATOkQJS4U4ab25sf9IQD5AW/YM/B7ntxb MFAZ4L+sgWE2Pb/SLhWU7bTrPU3dJg0= =6i2i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YLEgTo6BKmXMajGs--