Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Chipone ICNA3512 OLED driver bindings

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The vendor prefix 'ayntec' is used in compatible strings but is not documented in vendor-prefixes.yaml, which will cause dt_binding_check to fail.
--

commit 5d6611d7262ab82a8a3721761623b1f394d6e2ec
Author: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>

dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Chipone ICNA3512 OLED driver bindings

This commit adds device tree bindings for the Chipone ICNA3512 and ICNA3520
MIPI-DSI OLED panel drivers.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..90e69f30cd91c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml

[ ... ]

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - ayaneo,pocketds-panel-top
> +              - ayntec,odin2portal-panel

[Severity: Low]
Does this new vendor prefix need to be added to vendor-prefixes.yaml?

Device tree schema validation verifies all compatible strings against the
known list of vendor prefixes. Since 'ayntec' isn't currently documented
there, will this cause dt_binding_check to report errors when validating
this schema?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260607-icna35xx-v4-0-64de514add34@gmail.com?part=1