From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:44:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609014404.AD5DA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609013107.5995-5-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `fsi_stream_is_working()` acquires a lock to validate a pointer but returns a boolean and drops the lock before the caller uses the pointer, creating a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Sleepable Common Clock Framework (CCF) APIs are called from within the ALSA PCM atomic trigger path, causing a sleep-in-atomic bug.
--
commit da681410389113931660183bb91da994c3ed66c1
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working()
Move fsi_stream_is_working() before fsi_count_fifo_err() to prepare for a
subsequent patch. No functional changes are intended.
> when handling in-flight IRQ handlers. No functional changwqes intended.
This isn't a bug, but there's a typo (changwqes) in the commit message.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> index 800ac40f9680d..0bd0e0c8c5a30 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -442,6 +442,16 @@ static int fsi_sample2frame(struct fsi_priv *fsi, int samples)
> return samples / fsi->chan_num;
> }
>
> +static int fsi_stream_is_working(struct fsi_priv *fsi,
> + struct fsi_stream *io)
> +{
> + struct fsi_master *master = fsi_get_master(fsi);
> +
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&master->lock);
> +
> + return !!(io->substream && io->substream->runtime);
> +}
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does returning a boolean here
create a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition?
When fsi_pio_transfer() calls this, it uses the boolean result to locklessly
call fsi_pio_get_area():
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_transfer() {
...
if (!fsi_stream_is_working(fsi, io))
return -EINVAL;
buf = fsi_pio_get_area(fsi, io);
...
}
fsi_pio_get_area() then directly accesses io->substream->runtime:
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_get_area() {
...
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = io->substream->runtime;
...
}
Concurrently, if ALSA invokes fsi_dai_trigger(SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP), it
calls fsi_stream_quit() which acquires master->lock and clears the pointer:
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_stream_quit() {
...
guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&master->lock);
...
io->substream = NULL;
...
}
If fsi_stream_quit() executes after fsi_stream_is_working() drops the lock
but before fsi_pio_get_area() dereferences io->substream->runtime, could
this result in a NULL pointer dereference?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the ALSA trigger path
call sleepable clock APIs while in atomic context?
When ALSA invokes the snd_pcm_trigger callback fsi_dai_trigger() on the
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START path, it executes in atomic context (with the
substream spinlock held and local interrupts disabled).
This calls fsi_hw_startup(), which subsequently triggers fsi_clk_enable():
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_dai_trigger() {
...
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
...
if (!ret)
ret = fsi_hw_startup(fsi, io, dai->dev);
...
}
fsi_hw_startup() then executes:
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_hw_startup() {
...
if (fsi_is_clk_master(fsi))
return fsi_clk_enable(dev, fsi);
...
}
fsi_clk_enable() calls the driver's dynamic .set_rate callback:
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_clk_enable() {
...
ret = clock->set_rate(dev, fsi);
...
}
For example, fsi_clk_set_rate_cpg() invokes clk_set_rate():
sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_clk_set_rate_cpg() {
...
ret = clk_set_rate(ick, best_cout);
...
}
Since clk_set_rate() acquires the prepare_lock mutex, won't this trigger
a sleep-in-atomic bug or deadlock?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609013107.5995-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 1:30 [PATCH v5 00/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix system hang by adding SPU clock phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,fsi: add support multiple clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7740: Add clocks for FSI phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix trigger stop ordering phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ after shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Use devm_clk_get_optional() for optional clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: refactor clock initialization phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock support phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock control in hw_startup/shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:50 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609014404.AD5DA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox