Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:44:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609014404.AD5DA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609013107.5995-5-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `fsi_stream_is_working()` acquires a lock to validate a pointer but returns a boolean and drops the lock before the caller uses the pointer, creating a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Sleepable Common Clock Framework (CCF) APIs are called from within the ALSA PCM atomic trigger path, causing a sleep-in-atomic bug.
--

commit da681410389113931660183bb91da994c3ed66c1
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

    ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working()

Move fsi_stream_is_working() before fsi_count_fifo_err() to prepare for a
subsequent patch. No functional changes are intended.

>     when handling in-flight IRQ handlers. No functional changwqes intended.

This isn't a bug, but there's a typo (changwqes) in the commit message.

> diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> index 800ac40f9680d..0bd0e0c8c5a30 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -442,6 +442,16 @@ static int fsi_sample2frame(struct fsi_priv *fsi, int samples)
>  	return samples / fsi->chan_num;
>  }
>  
> +static int fsi_stream_is_working(struct fsi_priv *fsi,
> +				 struct fsi_stream *io)
> +{
> +	struct fsi_master *master = fsi_get_master(fsi);
> +
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&master->lock);
> +
> +	return !!(io->substream && io->substream->runtime);
> +}
> +

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does returning a boolean here
create a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition?

When fsi_pio_transfer() calls this, it uses the boolean result to locklessly
call fsi_pio_get_area():

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_transfer() {
	...
	if (!fsi_stream_is_working(fsi, io))
		return -EINVAL;
	buf = fsi_pio_get_area(fsi, io);
	...
}

fsi_pio_get_area() then directly accesses io->substream->runtime:

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_get_area() {
	...
	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = io->substream->runtime;
	...
}

Concurrently, if ALSA invokes fsi_dai_trigger(SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP), it
calls fsi_stream_quit() which acquires master->lock and clears the pointer:

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_stream_quit() {
	...
	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&master->lock);
	...
	io->substream	= NULL;
	...
}

If fsi_stream_quit() executes after fsi_stream_is_working() drops the lock
but before fsi_pio_get_area() dereferences io->substream->runtime, could
this result in a NULL pointer dereference?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the ALSA trigger path
call sleepable clock APIs while in atomic context?

When ALSA invokes the snd_pcm_trigger callback fsi_dai_trigger() on the
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START path, it executes in atomic context (with the
substream spinlock held and local interrupts disabled).

This calls fsi_hw_startup(), which subsequently triggers fsi_clk_enable():

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_dai_trigger() {
	...
	case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
	...
		if (!ret)
			ret = fsi_hw_startup(fsi, io, dai->dev);
	...
}

fsi_hw_startup() then executes:

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_hw_startup() {
	...
	if (fsi_is_clk_master(fsi))
		return fsi_clk_enable(dev, fsi);
	...
}

fsi_clk_enable() calls the driver's dynamic .set_rate callback:

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_clk_enable() {
	...
	ret = clock->set_rate(dev, fsi);
	...
}

For example, fsi_clk_set_rate_cpg() invokes clk_set_rate():

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_clk_set_rate_cpg() {
	...
	ret = clk_set_rate(ick, best_cout);
	...
}

Since clk_set_rate() acquires the prepare_lock mutex, won't this trigger
a sleep-in-atomic bug or deadlock?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609013107.5995-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  1:30 [PATCH v5 00/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix system hang by adding SPU clock phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,fsi: add support multiple clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7740: Add clocks for FSI phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix trigger stop ordering phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ after shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Use devm_clk_get_optional() for optional clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: refactor clock initialization phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock support phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock control in hw_startup/shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:50   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609014404.AD5DA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox