Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:46:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609014611.C0AE71F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609013107.5995-7-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A TOCTOU race condition in `fsi_stream_is_working()` allows concurrent stream shutdown, leading to hardware accesses while clocks are gated and NULL pointer dereferences.
--

commit 2a7ff11c2bbdedadae9c569f5a5fb36f784c525a
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init()
    
Move fsi_clk_init() after set_rate() functions to prepare for subsequent
refactoring.

> diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> index 3e3c6fd7c56b8..1df7dc0143630 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1034,6 +970,70 @@ static int fsi_clk_set_rate_cpg(struct device *dev,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int fsi_clk_init(struct device *dev,

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing the clock
handling in this file, does fsi_stream_is_working() have a TOCTOU race
condition that allows concurrent stream shutdown?

It appears that fsi_stream_is_working() acquires and immediately releases
master->lock before returning a boolean. Concurrently, an ALSA
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP on another CPU can call fsi_stream_quit(), which
acquires the lock, sets io->substream = NULL, and releases it. This can be
followed by fsi_hw_shutdown() disabling the hardware clocks.

Because the lock is dropped in fsi_stream_is_working(), can an in-flight
fsi_interrupt() on CPU 0 evaluate the check as true, after which CPU 1
processes the STOP trigger, zeroes the substream pointer, and gates the
clocks?

CPU 0 could then proceed to access hardware registers while clocks are
disabled:

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_count_fifo_err() {
	if (!fsi_stream_is_working(fsi, &fsi->playback) &&
	    !fsi_stream_is_working(fsi, &fsi->capture))
		return;

	u32 ostatus = fsi_reg_read(fsi, DOFF_ST);
	...
}

Would this cause a system hang due to hardware access while clocks are
gated?

Additionally, in fsi_pio_transfer(), could this same TOCTOU race allow
execution to reach fsi_pio_get_area(), which unconditionally dereferences
io->substream->runtime?

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_transfer() {
	if (!fsi_stream_is_working(fsi, io))
		return -EINVAL;

	buf = fsi_pio_get_area(fsi, io);
	...
}

sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c:fsi_pio_get_area() {
	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = io->substream->runtime;

	return runtime->dma_area + ...
}

Could this result in a NULL pointer dereference if io->substream was
zeroed? This seems to be an issue that was only partially addressed by the
earlier commit "ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ
after shutdown".

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609013107.5995-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  1:30 [PATCH v5 00/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix system hang by adding SPU clock phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,fsi: add support multiple clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7740: Add clocks for FSI phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix trigger stop ordering phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ after shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Use devm_clk_get_optional() for optional clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: refactor clock initialization phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock support phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock control in hw_startup/shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:50   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609014611.C0AE71F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox