From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609015102.9E7E61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609013107.5995-11-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The interrupt handler `fsi_interrupt` reads and writes hardware registers before verifying if any streams are active, risking system hangs.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `fsi_clk_enable()` incorrectly returns `-EINVAL` and improperly manages `clock->count` when a second concurrent stream is started, breaking full-duplex operation.
- [High] The driver calls `clk_set_rate` and `clk_set_parent` from the atomic PCM trigger callback, causing a 'scheduling while atomic' bug.
- [High] Opening or closing a stream resets the shared clock rate via `fsi_clk_invalid()`, corrupting the state of an already running concurrent stream and causing permanent clock reference leaks.
- [High] Lockless access to the shared `clock->count` variable leads to race conditions and unbalanced clock reference counts when playback and capture are triggered concurrently.
--
commit f7c3ccc68e9715cc648ab7fe51a1667d7610390b
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare()
Add fsi_clk_prepare() and fsi_clk_unprepare() helpers and call them
from fsi_dai_startup() and fsi_dai_shutdown(). This ensures clk_prepare()
and clk_unprepare() are executed from sleepable contexts and keeps clocks
prepared only while audio streams are active.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> index 6c432c7235a41..80e87b815c1b6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,54 @@ static int fsi_clk_is_valid(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
> fsi->clock.rate;
> }
>
> +static int fsi_clk_prepare(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
[ ... ]
> +static void fsi_clk_unprepare(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
[ ... ]
> +}
> +
> static int fsi_clk_enable(struct device *dev,
> struct fsi_priv *fsi)
> {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does fsi_clk_enable() break when a second
concurrent stream is started?
In fsi_clk_enable():
int ret = -EINVAL;
if (!fsi_clk_is_valid(fsi))
return ret;
if (0 == clock->count) {
...
}
return ret;
If clock->count > 0, such as when starting a capture stream while playback is
already active, the zero check is skipped entirely. The function then returns
the unassigned ret (-EINVAL), causing the ALSA trigger callback to fail.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does fsi_clk_enable() cause a
"scheduling while atomic" bug?
The ALSA fsi_dai_trigger() callback executes in an atomic context with the PCM
substream spinlock held and interrupts disabled. On a START trigger, it calls
fsi_hw_startup(), which invokes fsi_clk_enable():
if (0 == clock->count) {
ret = clock->set_rate(dev, fsi);
The clock->set_rate() functions invoke clk_set_rate() and clk_set_parent(),
which acquire the clk_prepare_lock mutex and can sleep.
Calling them from an atomic context causes a BUG. While this patch moves
clk_prepare() to the sleepable startup callback, rate setting remains in the
atomic trigger path.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could lockless access to the shared
clock->count variable lead to race conditions?
The fsi_priv struct and its clock->count member are shared between playback
and capture substreams on the same DAI. ALSA PCM trigger callbacks are
serialized per-substream, not per-DAI, allowing playback and capture triggers
to execute concurrently.
fsi_clk_enable() checks if count is zero and increments it without any
locking. If both streams start concurrently, both CPUs can observe count == 0,
execute the clk_enable logic simultaneously, and increment count to 2, but
clk_enable() was called twice for each clock.
When stopping, fsi_clk_disable() uses `if (1 == clock->count--)`. The first
stop drops count from 2 to 1 and does not call clk_disable(). The second stop
drops count from 1 to 0 and calls clk_disable() once. This leaves the clock
enable counts permanently unbalanced by +1.
> @@ -1580,7 +1628,7 @@ static int fsi_dai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>
> fsi_clk_invalid(fsi);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does calling fsi_clk_invalid() here corrupt
the state of concurrent active streams?
Because fsi_priv is shared between playback and capture, opening a new stream
while another is actively running overwrites the operating stream's clock rate
to 0.
When the active stream is eventually stopped, fsi_hw_shutdown() calls
fsi_clk_disable(). Because fsi_clk_is_valid() relies on the now zeroed
clock->rate, it evaluates to false.
This causes fsi_clk_disable() to return -EINVAL immediately without
decrementing clock->count or disabling the hardware clocks, resulting in a
permanent clock enable leak.
>
> - return 0;
> + return fsi_clk_prepare(fsi);
> }
>
> static void fsi_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> @@ -1588,6 +1636,7 @@ static void fsi_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> {
> struct fsi_priv *fsi = fsi_get_priv(substream);
>
> + fsi_clk_unprepare(fsi);
[Severity: High]
Could unpreparing the clock here risk a system hang in the interrupt handler?
If an in-flight or spurious IRQ fires after streams are shut down, the
fsi_interrupt() handler executes. If the SPU clock is disabled, the handler
immediately accesses hardware registers before verifying if any streams are
active:
u32 int_st = fsi_irq_get_status(master);
/* clear irq status */
fsi_master_mask_set(master, SOFT_RST, IR, 0);
fsi_master_mask_set(master, SOFT_RST, IR, IR);
Accessing INT_ST and SOFT_RST registers with the SPU clock gated will cause
the system to hang.
> fsi_clk_invalid(fsi);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609013107.5995-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 1:30 [PATCH v5 00/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix system hang by adding SPU clock phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,fsi: add support multiple clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7740: Add clocks for FSI phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix trigger stop ordering phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ after shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Use devm_clk_get_optional() for optional clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: refactor clock initialization phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock support phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock control in hw_startup/shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09 1:50 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609015102.9E7E61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox