Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:51:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609015102.9E7E61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609013107.5995-11-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The interrupt handler `fsi_interrupt` reads and writes hardware registers before verifying if any streams are active, risking system hangs.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `fsi_clk_enable()` incorrectly returns `-EINVAL` and improperly manages `clock->count` when a second concurrent stream is started, breaking full-duplex operation.
- [High] The driver calls `clk_set_rate` and `clk_set_parent` from the atomic PCM trigger callback, causing a 'scheduling while atomic' bug.
- [High] Opening or closing a stream resets the shared clock rate via `fsi_clk_invalid()`, corrupting the state of an already running concurrent stream and causing permanent clock reference leaks.
- [High] Lockless access to the shared `clock->count` variable leads to race conditions and unbalanced clock reference counts when playback and capture are triggered concurrently.
--

commit f7c3ccc68e9715cc648ab7fe51a1667d7610390b
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare()

Add fsi_clk_prepare() and fsi_clk_unprepare() helpers and call them
from fsi_dai_startup() and fsi_dai_shutdown(). This ensures clk_prepare()
and clk_unprepare() are executed from sleepable contexts and keeps clocks
prepared only while audio streams are active.

> diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> index 6c432c7235a41..80e87b815c1b6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/fsi.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,54 @@ static int fsi_clk_is_valid(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
>  		fsi->clock.rate;
>  }
>  
> +static int fsi_clk_prepare(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
[ ... ]
> +static void fsi_clk_unprepare(struct fsi_priv *fsi)
[ ... ]
> +}
> +
>  static int fsi_clk_enable(struct device *dev,
>  			  struct fsi_priv *fsi)
>  {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does fsi_clk_enable() break when a second
concurrent stream is started?

In fsi_clk_enable():

	int ret = -EINVAL;

	if (!fsi_clk_is_valid(fsi))
		return ret;

	if (0 == clock->count) {
		...
	}

	return ret;

If clock->count > 0, such as when starting a capture stream while playback is
already active, the zero check is skipped entirely. The function then returns
the unassigned ret (-EINVAL), causing the ALSA trigger callback to fail.

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does fsi_clk_enable() cause a
"scheduling while atomic" bug?

The ALSA fsi_dai_trigger() callback executes in an atomic context with the PCM
substream spinlock held and interrupts disabled. On a START trigger, it calls
fsi_hw_startup(), which invokes fsi_clk_enable():

	if (0 == clock->count) {
		ret = clock->set_rate(dev, fsi);

The clock->set_rate() functions invoke clk_set_rate() and clk_set_parent(),
which acquire the clk_prepare_lock mutex and can sleep.

Calling them from an atomic context causes a BUG. While this patch moves
clk_prepare() to the sleepable startup callback, rate setting remains in the
atomic trigger path.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could lockless access to the shared
clock->count variable lead to race conditions?

The fsi_priv struct and its clock->count member are shared between playback
and capture substreams on the same DAI. ALSA PCM trigger callbacks are
serialized per-substream, not per-DAI, allowing playback and capture triggers
to execute concurrently.

fsi_clk_enable() checks if count is zero and increments it without any
locking. If both streams start concurrently, both CPUs can observe count == 0,
execute the clk_enable logic simultaneously, and increment count to 2, but
clk_enable() was called twice for each clock.

When stopping, fsi_clk_disable() uses `if (1 == clock->count--)`. The first
stop drops count from 2 to 1 and does not call clk_disable(). The second stop
drops count from 1 to 0 and calls clk_disable() once. This leaves the clock
enable counts permanently unbalanced by +1.

> @@ -1580,7 +1628,7 @@ static int fsi_dai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>  
>  	fsi_clk_invalid(fsi);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does calling fsi_clk_invalid() here corrupt
the state of concurrent active streams?

Because fsi_priv is shared between playback and capture, opening a new stream
while another is actively running overwrites the operating stream's clock rate
to 0.

When the active stream is eventually stopped, fsi_hw_shutdown() calls
fsi_clk_disable(). Because fsi_clk_is_valid() relies on the now zeroed
clock->rate, it evaluates to false.

This causes fsi_clk_disable() to return -EINVAL immediately without
decrementing clock->count or disabling the hardware clocks, resulting in a
permanent clock enable leak.

>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return fsi_clk_prepare(fsi);
>  }
>  
>  static void fsi_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> @@ -1588,6 +1636,7 @@ static void fsi_dai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>  {
>  	struct fsi_priv *fsi = fsi_get_priv(substream);
>  
> +	fsi_clk_unprepare(fsi);

[Severity: High]
Could unpreparing the clock here risk a system hang in the interrupt handler?

If an in-flight or spurious IRQ fires after streams are shut down, the
fsi_interrupt() handler executes. If the SPU clock is disabled, the handler
immediately accesses hardware registers before verifying if any streams are
active:

    u32 int_st = fsi_irq_get_status(master);

    /* clear irq status */
    fsi_master_mask_set(master, SOFT_RST, IR, 0);
    fsi_master_mask_set(master, SOFT_RST, IR, IR);

Accessing INT_ST and SOFT_RST registers with the SPU clock gated will cause
the system to hang.

>  	fsi_clk_invalid(fsi);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609013107.5995-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  1:30 [PATCH v5 00/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix system hang by adding SPU clock phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,fsi: add support multiple clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: dts: renesas: r8a7740: Add clocks for FSI phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix trigger stop ordering phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_stream_is_working() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Fix register access from in-flight IRQ after shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Move fsi_clk_init() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Use devm_clk_get_optional() for optional clocks phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: refactor clock initialization phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock support phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: add fsi_clk_prepare/unprepare() phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:51   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09  1:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ASoC: renesas: fsi: Add SPU clock control in hw_startup/shutdown phucduc.bui
2026-06-09  1:50   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609015102.9E7E61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox