From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jingyuan Liang" <jingyliang@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] dt-bindings: input: Document hid-over-spi DT schema
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:50:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609045001.61D621F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-send-upstream-v4-9-b843d5e6ced3@chromium.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `read-opcode` and `write-opcode` properties are defined as `uint8`, which will cause the driver to fail probing with `-EOVERFLOW` if using u32 reads.
- [Low] Missing 'reg' property in the 'required' list for an SPI peripheral.
--
commit 455b6048d6e6dd86252693c3c8edc0762c5dbba4
Author: Jingyuan Liang <jingyliang@chromium.org>
dt-bindings: input: Document hid-over-spi DT schema
Documentation describes the required and optional properties for
implementing Device Tree for a Microsoft G6 Touch Digitizer that
supports HID over SPI Protocol 1.0 specification.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/hid-over-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/hid-over-spi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..27cf311e0aab0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/hid-over-spi.yaml
[ ... ]
> + read-opcode:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8
> + description:
> + Value to be used in Read Approval packets. 1 byte.
> +
> + write-opcode:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8
> + description:
> + Value to be used in Write Approval packets. 1 byte.
[Severity: High]
Will defining these as uint8 cause the driver probe to fail?
In the driver (drivers/hid/spi-hid/spi-hid-of.c), spi_hid_of_populate_config()
reads these using device_property_read_u32().
If a conforming device tree provides 1-byte properties,
device_property_read_u32() will return -EOVERFLOW because the property length
is less than 4 bytes, causing the probe to abort.
Should the driver be updated to use device_property_read_u8(), or should
these schema properties be uint32?
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - interrupts
> + - reset-gpios
> + - vdd-supply
[Severity: Low]
Should 'reg' be included in this required list?
Although spi-controller.yaml enforces 'reg' for child nodes matching the
@[0-9a-f]+$ pattern, a malformed node without a unit address would bypass
this check and silently pass schema validation against this binding.
> + - input-report-header-address
> + - input-report-body-address
> + - output-report-address
> + - read-opcode
> + - write-opcode
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609-send-upstream-v4-0-b843d5e6ced3@chromium.org?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 4:40 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add spi-hid transport driver Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] Documentation: Correction in HID output_report callback description Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] HID: Add BUS_SPI support and define HID_SPI_DEVICE macro Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] HID: spi-hid: add transport driver skeleton for HID over SPI bus Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] HID: spi-hid: add spi-hid driver HID layer Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] HID: spi-hid: add HID SPI protocol implementation Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] HID: spi_hid: add spi_hid traces Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] HID: spi_hid: add ACPI support for SPI over HID Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] HID: spi_hid: add device tree " Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] dt-bindings: input: Document hid-over-spi DT schema Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 4:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] HID: spi-hid: add power management implementation Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 4:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] HID: spi-hid: add panel follower support Jingyuan Liang
2026-06-09 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609045001.61D621F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jingyliang@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox