From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Varadarajan Narayanan" <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens: Add support for ipq9650 tsens
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:06:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609070606.177DF1F0089E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609065447.4024695-3-varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The device tree property `#qcom,sensors` can override `num_sensors`, leading to an out-of-bounds read of the static `hw_ids` array and subsequent out-of-bounds array accesses.
--
commit 1557d45f1d577e6cb959599793cf39e4448627b6
Author: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens: Add support for ipq9650 tsens
This commit adds support for the ipq9650 tsens device by reusing the
ipq5332 ops and features, while defining a custom hardware ID array for
its 11 sensors.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> index 8d9698ea3ec40..ef1fee2266a32 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,14 @@ const struct tsens_plat_data data_ipq5424 = {
> .fields = tsens_v2_regfields,
> };
>
> +const struct tsens_plat_data data_ipq9650 = {
> + .num_sensors = 11,
> + .ops = &ops_ipq5332,
> + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15},
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this hardcoded array expose us to
an out-of-bounds read if the device tree overrides the number of sensors?
In drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c:tsens_probe(), the number of sensors can
be overridden by the #qcom,sensors DT property. The probe function later
initializes the sensors in a loop:
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
if (data->hw_ids)
priv->sensor[i].hw_id = data->hw_ids[i];
else
priv->sensor[i].hw_id = i;
}
If a device tree specifies a larger number of sensors than the length of
this new array (for example 12, which is under the MAX_SENSORS limit of 16),
will the initialization loop read past the end of the hw_ids array?
It looks like this could result in garbage values being stored as hw_id,
which are then used as offsets for the fixed-size priv->rf[] regmap field
array, potentially causing arbitrary out-of-bounds pointer dereferences.
> + .feat = &ipq5332_feat,
> + .fields = tsens_v2_regfields,
> +};
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609065447.4024695-1-varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 6:54 [PATCH PREVIEW v2 0/2] Add support tsens in ipq5210 & ipq9650 Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-06-09 6:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: add ipq5210 & ipq9650 compatible Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-06-09 7:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal/drivers/qcom/tsens: Add support for ipq9650 tsens Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-06-09 7:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609070606.177DF1F0089E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox