From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Wang via B4 Relay" <devnull+wangjia.ultrarisc.com@kernel.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add UltraRISC DP1000 pinctrl controller
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:39:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610053911.6543D1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610-ultrarisc-pinctrl-v4-1-b7e9b2a8ed84@ultrarisc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The use of `unevaluatedProperties: false` defeats the intended explicit restriction of standard pin configuration properties.
--
commit fcd21f9963cf534da789bb36bb2012a9e157e4d1
Author: Jia Wang <wangjia@ultrarisc.com>
dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add UltraRISC DP1000 pinctrl controller
This commit adds the device tree binding documentation for the pin controller
found on the UltraRISC DP1000 RISC-V SoC.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ultrarisc,dp1000-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ultrarisc,dp1000-pinctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ultrarisc,dp1000-pinctrl.yaml
[ ... ]
> +patternProperties:
> + '.*-pins$':
> + type: object
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + allOf:
> + - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml#
> + - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml#
[Severity: Low]
Since this node uses unevaluatedProperties: false alongside a reference to
pincfg-node.yaml#, all standard pin configuration properties will be
inherently evaluated and allowed by the schema.
Does this defeat the intended explicit restriction of standard pin
configuration properties defined below?
[ ... ]
> + function:
> + description: |
> + Mux function to select for the listed pins. Supported functions
> + depend on the selected pins and match the DP1000 hardware mux
> + table.
> + enum:
> + - gpio
> + - i2c
> + - pwm
> + - spi
> + - uart
> + - lpc
> + - espi
> +
> + bias-disable: true
> + bias-high-impedance: true
> + bias-pull-up: true
> + bias-pull-down: true
> +
> + drive-strength:
> + description: Output drive strength in mA.
> + enum: [20, 27, 33, 40]
If the goal is to restrict the node to only these explicitly listed
properties, should additionalProperties: false be used in the
patternProperties block instead?
With unevaluatedProperties: false, unsupported properties like slew-rate or
input-debounce will silently pass schema validation, rendering these explicit
boolean property declarations redundant.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-ultrarisc-pinctrl-v4-0-b7e9b2a8ed84@ultrarisc.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 5:29 [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: ultrarisc: add DP1000 pinctrl support Jia Wang via B4 Relay
2026-06-10 5:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add UltraRISC DP1000 pinctrl controller Jia Wang via B4 Relay
2026-06-10 5:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 5:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ultrarisc: Add UltraRISC DP1000 pinctrl driver Jia Wang via B4 Relay
2026-06-10 7:16 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610053911.6543D1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+wangjia.ultrarisc.com@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox