From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen-Yu Yeh" <chenyou910331@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: dts: sophgo: Add Milk-V Duo 256M board support
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:20:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610142049.93E0A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610121026.1517621-2-chenyou910331@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The device tree references an undefined label `&usb`, which will cause a fatal dtc compilation error.
- [Medium] The commit message claims to add support for an 'Onboard blue status LED', but the corresponding LED node is completely missing from the device tree.
- [Low] Accidental removal of the trailing newline at the end of the Makefile.
- [Low] Potentially stale or incomplete copyright attribution in the new DTS file.
--
commit 1a0c595fbd52010c818ad842d5ef53c54212434e
Author: Chen-Yu Yeh <chenyou910331@gmail.com>
riscv: dts: sophgo: Add Milk-V Duo 256M board support
The Milk-V Duo 256M is a small form factor development board based on
the Sophgo SG2002 SoC.
> - Onboard blue status LED (connected to PWR_GPIO[2] / porte 2)
>
> Tested on actual Milk-V Duo 256M hardware, verified boot to shell and
> heartbeat LED functionality.
[Severity: Medium]
Is the LED node missing from the device tree? The commit message mentions
support and verification for an onboard blue status LED, but there does
not seem to be a corresponding leds or gpio-leds node in the patch.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile
[ ... ]
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOPHGO) += sg2042-evb-v1.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOPHGO) += sg2042-evb-v2.dtb
> -dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOPHGO) += sg2044-sophgo-srd3-10.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SOPHGO) += sg2044-sophgo-srd3-10.dtb
> \ No newline at end of file
[Severity: Low]
this isn't a bug, but was the trailing newline accidentally removed from
the end of the Makefile?
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002-milkv-duo256m.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002-milkv-duo256m.dts
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002-milkv-duo256m.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> + */
[Severity: Low]
this isn't a bug, but is this copyright attribution stale? The file appears
to use a template from 2023, and it might be missing the 2026 copyright for
the current author.
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sg2002.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
[Severity: Medium]
Is this header still required? It seems unused in the newly added device
tree file, possibly because the LED node was accidentally dropped.
[ ... ]
> +&uart0 {
> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_cfg>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb {
> + dr_mode = "host";
> + status = "okay";
> +};
[Severity: High]
Will this compile successfully? It looks like the usb label is not defined
in the included base SoC device tree files, which could cause a dtc syntax
error during the build.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610121026.1517621-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 12:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: add Milk-V Duo 256M board Chen-Yu Yeh
2026-06-10 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: dts: sophgo: Add Milk-V Duo 256M board support Chen-Yu Yeh
2026-06-10 14:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 16:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: add Milk-V Duo 256M board Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610142049.93E0A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chenyou910331@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox