From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E50A35C190; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781168015; cv=none; b=ZA+Gk/OOEHc2qNXArD1fAIC+ZOWswfRnIXzfDcFwX03LXJxYrHT9eXFKk7km/hHK8v8KAZQHtPhcH1RO8Q3y8jXkAWZqycPKEDMz/AHZIT16mn2m1BhO7LSSqISLwVglg1SzQpuq8B2inaW9TUDWDBtzg/PleYEQ9g5R8jp4xOE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781168015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eqH7ANavCevHLiMAPvzsb1H7Ap650s5wyNUr10SOOgg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YWtLnRBJFUQrg1b4AFwXFlGfbXH7Lf+fMkiaylC5LOwJ0SyggHBrfRSv5yLK7w/ahoP3YySMhCby9GctXNxbVnuhNPQrhXAkJSIntriCz04WSGK2yH77SaLo6eyOyqCnVa/iYZ93SjwCGNzOvdH6A1TJzseunU8TPFIaG/KBOTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eR4PW+t4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eR4PW+t4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801291F00893; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:53:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781168014; bh=RkaMDJv2k3WR+KxoPtZX4VuY7kdj3G9qSMG6ex+5q5Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eR4PW+t4dG2N2gll2evKsNnHjmj/qGrL5hi0MIXaqBqZUGppb7v2gIKAMpjD122aM pxvS19hSjIo5oagLCqQ2VR7EVI5+IW21Oc5r2aY1I5/GjtiQJg/zamVGVVQKja+erb MCDlbe7Xp+kyMSKum3sCs7WjtiRL47EU9WYy5+QXcpsq/nYWJDJmdTYtlLUPDvtJw9 g6ePt7ySApnqDmJjoE0wU6/NnoO2D6PETXfbYtfNTrFyZ8U6d1Bw8+k4vPygxMmlCK hRJOYVoeapN8jsNRvpUdBWIhcKfy2nfz5Rb1OEMjYPYMXJE/t7kNJZNLE2UsOs/FAv BqcdWL2Mzm7Ng== Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:53:31 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Fenglin Wu Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , David Collins , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Kamal Wadhwa , kernel@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spmi: glymur-spmi-pmic-arb: Add compatible for Qualcomm Maili SoC Message-ID: <20260611-happy-bullfrog-from-lemuria-3fd5df@quoll> References: <20260609-maili-spmi-binding-v1-1-80fc4b6bb80f@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260609-maili-spmi-binding-v1-1-80fc4b6bb80f@oss.qualcomm.com> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:29:24PM -0700, Fenglin Wu wrote: > The PMIC arbiter in the Qualcomm Maili SoC is version v8.5, which > is the same with Hawi and compatible with Glymur. Hence, add a string > for "qcom,maili-spmi-pmic-arb" as a compatible entry for > "qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb". > > Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof