Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Move PCIe phy and GPIOs to root port node
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:19:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611051917.26DA11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611-wake-v2-26-2744251b1181@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Commit message and code mismatch regarding the `phy-names` property.
--

commit 3bba776bd4c695d8130ddad562efe19bc319bd91
Author: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>

arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Move PCIe phy and GPIOs to root port node

This patch relocates the PCIe PHY references and perst/wake GPIO properties
from the root complex controller nodes to the root port nodes. It also assigns
labels to the root port nodes and updates the respective board files.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
[ ... ]
> @@ -1779,13 +1779,11 @@ pcie0: pcie@1c00000 {
>  					<&gem_noc MASTER_AMPSS_M0 0 &config_noc SLAVE_PCIE_0 0>;
>  			interconnect-names = "pcie-mem", "cpu-pcie";
>  
> -			phys = <&pcie0_phy>;
> -			phy-names = "pciephy";
>  			dma-coherent;
>  
>  			status = "disabled";
>  
> -			pcie@0 {
> +			pcie0_port0: pcie@0 {
>  				device_type = "pci";
>  				reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
>  				bus-range = <0x01 0xff>;
> @@ -1793,6 +1791,8 @@ pcie@0 {
>  				#address-cells = <3>;
>  				#size-cells = <2>;
>  				ranges;
> +
> +				phys = <&pcie0_phy>;
>  			};

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions "Move phys and phy-names from the controller to
pcie0_port0, pcie1_port0, pcie2_port0, and pcie3_port0...", but does this
actually move the phy-names property?

It looks like phy-names is removed entirely from the controller and not added
alongside phys in the pcie0_port0 node (or the other port nodes).

If dropping phy-names is intentional because it is no longer required for
single-PHY nodes, could the commit message be updated to clarify that it is
being removed rather than moved?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611-wake-v2-0-2744251b1181@oss.qualcomm.com?part=26

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  4:58 [PATCH v2 00/37] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix PCIe wake GPIO polarity Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/37] ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/37] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/37] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 14/37] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 15/37] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 16/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8540p-ride: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 17/37] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 18/37] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 19/37] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: Move PCIe phy and GPIOs to root port node Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 20/37] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 21/37] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 22/37] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8550: Move PCIe " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:58 ` [PATCH v2 23/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  7:48   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 24/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8540p: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 25/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: Move PCIe phy and " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 26/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:19   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11  7:49   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 27/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 28/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 29/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 30/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 31/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 32/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 33/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 34/37] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 35/37] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 36/37] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  5:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11  4:59 ` [PATCH v2 37/37] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: " Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-06-11  7:24   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611051917.26DA11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox