From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] rtc: rzn1: Handle EPROBE_DEFER for optional pps interrupt
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:58:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615155848.9874B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615154805.1619693-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] If the optional 'xtal' clock is not present, `rtc->sync_time` remains 0, causing `readl_poll_timeout` to use a 0 timeout (infinite wait) and `usleep_range` to use a 0 delay.
--
commit 5d75a1049c228d2049afaf29833f1b2f212837d4
Author: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: rtc: rzn1: Handle EPROBE_DEFER for optional pps interrupt
This commit checks for -EPROBE_DEFER from platform_get_irq_byname_optional()
and handles the deferred probe request properly. It intercepts this specific
error condition, assigns it to the return value, and jumps to the
dis_runtime_pm label to avoid ignoring a valid probe deferral.
Fixes: eea7791e00f33 ("rtc: rzn1: implement one-second accuracy for alarms")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
> index c4ed437354574..f81d691c8b9a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
> @@ -465,6 +465,10 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "pps");
> + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + ret = irq;
> + goto dis_runtime_pm;
> + }
> if (irq >= 0)
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, rzn1_rtc_1s_irq, 0, "RZN1 RTC 1s", rtc);
[Severity: High]
If the optional xtal clock is not present, does rtc->sync_time remain 0,
causing readl_poll_timeout() to use a 0 timeout (infinite wait) and
usleep_range() to use a 0 delay?
devm_clk_get_optional() returns NULL if the clock is absent in the device
tree, skipping the calculation:
drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c:rzn1_rtc_probe() {
...
xtal = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "xtal");
if (IS_ERR(xtal)) {
...
} else if (xtal) {
rate = clk_get_rate(xtal);
...
rtc->sync_time = DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * NSEC_PER_MSEC, rate);
}
...
ret = readl_poll_timeout(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL0, val,
!(val & RZN1_RTC_CTL0_CEST), rtc->sync_time,
rtc->sync_time * 2);
...
}
In include/linux/iopoll.h, a timeout_us of 0 skips the timeout check
entirely, which could lead to a tight infinite loop and a kernel hard lockup
if the hardware fails to clear the CEST bit.
Additionally, rtc->sync_time being 0 causes usleep_range(0, 100) in
rzn1_rtc_set_time(), which may return almost immediately and violate the
hardware's explicit 2-clock-cycle delay requirement (previously hardcoded to
61us).
This regression was introduced by the commit 'rtc: rzn1: Dynamically
calculate synchronization delay based on clock rate' later in this series.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615154805.1619693-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 15:47 [PATCH 00/12] Add RTC support for Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/12] dt-bindings: rtc: renesas,rzn1-rtc: Add RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H support Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 16:22 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/12] rtc: rzn1: Handle EPROBE_DEFER for optional pps interrupt Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/12] rtc: rzn1: Fix malformed MODULE_AUTHOR string Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/12] rtc: Kconfig: Broaden RTC_DRV_RZN1 dependency to ARCH_RENESAS Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/12] rtc: rzn1: Add system suspend/resume support and wakeup capability Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/12] rtc: rzn1: Sort headers alphabetically Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 07/12] rtc: rzn1: fix alarm range check truncation on 32-bit systems Prabhakar
2026-06-15 16:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 08/12] rtc: rzn1: Dynamically calculate synchronization delay based on clock rate Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 09/12] rtc: rzn1: Use temporary variable for struct device Prabhakar
2026-06-15 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 10/12] rtc: rzn1: Consistently use dev_err_probe() Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 11/12] rtc: rzn1: use FIELD_PREP/FIELD_GET and GENMASK for register access Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 15:48 ` [PATCH 12/12] rtc: rzn1: Add support for Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs Prabhakar
2026-06-15 15:58 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615155848.9874B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox