From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Frieder Schrempf" <frieder@fris.de>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] firmware: imx: ele: Add API functions for OCOTP fuse access
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:06:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616120609.E7C3B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616-upstreaming-next-20260609-imx-ocotp-ele-v1-3-cb7f3698c3e6@kontron.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A timeout or interrupt during `ele_msg_send_rcv()` leaves a dangling pointer in the asynchronous mailbox callback state (`priv->waiting_rsp_clbk_hdl`), leading to a NULL pointer dereference and a Use-After-Free heap corruption upon a late firmware response.
--
commit d740730d233516ecbc0d56af8b1a5f692696bbf0
Author: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
firmware: imx: ele: Add API functions for OCOTP fuse access
This commit adds the ele_read_fuse() and ele_write_fuse() functions to the
ELE S400 API to provide read and write access to OCOTP fuse registers. These
are exposed via imx_se_read_fuse() and imx_se_write_fuse() for use by drivers
such as the OCOTP S400 NVMEM driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> index ec718d322abcd..281d223aa1447 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -303,3 +304,124 @@ int ele_debug_dump(struct se_if_priv *priv)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +static int ele_read_fuse(struct se_if_priv *priv, uint16_t fuse_id, u32 *value)
> +{
> + struct se_api_msg *tx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct se_api_msg *rx_msg __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + int rx_msg_sz = ELE_READ_FUSE_RSP_MSG_SZ;
> + int ret = 0;
[ ... ]
> + tx_msg->data[0] = fuse_id;
> +
> + ret = ele_msg_send_rcv(priv->priv_dev_ctx, tx_msg,
> + ELE_READ_FUSE_REQ_MSG_SZ, rx_msg, rx_msg_sz);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but will a late firmware response cause a
use-after-free here if ele_msg_send_rcv() times out or is interrupted?
If ele_msg_send_rcv() returns an error, it clears the dev_ctx but leaves the
dangling rx_msg pointer in the shared callback handle:
drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c:ele_msg_send_rcv() {
...
if (priv->waiting_rsp_clbk_hdl.signal_rcvd) {
err = -EINTR;
priv->waiting_rsp_clbk_hdl.signal_rcvd = false;
}
priv->waiting_rsp_clbk_hdl.dev_ctx = NULL;
return err;
}
Because rx_msg is managed with __free(kfree), it is immediately freed when
ele_read_fuse() returns on this error path.
If a late response arrives afterwards, se_if_rx_callback() will process it.
It first causes a NULL pointer dereference if dynamic debug is enabled:
drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c:se_if_rx_callback() {
...
dev_dbg(dev, "Selecting resp waiter:%s ...",
se_clbk_hdl->dev_ctx->devname);
Then it unconditionally copies the response into the freed rx_msg buffer:
...
memcpy(se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg, msg, se_clbk_hdl->rx_msg_sz);
}
Does waiting_rsp_clbk_hdl need to be fully cleared (including setting rx_msg
and rx_msg_sz to zero) on error paths in ele_msg_send_rcv() to prevent this
memory corruption?
> +
> + ret = se_val_rsp_hdr_n_status(priv, rx_msg, ELE_READ_FUSE_REQ,
> + rx_msg_sz, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *value = rx_msg->data[1];
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616-upstreaming-next-20260609-imx-ocotp-ele-v1-0-cb7f3698c3e6@kontron.de?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 11:52 [PATCH 0/9] Support ELE API in i.MX OCOTP NVMEM driver Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: nvmem: imx-ocotp: Add support for secure-enclave Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] firmware: imx: ele: Fix indentation in ele_base_msg.h Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] firmware: imx: ele: Add API functions for OCOTP fuse access Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 12:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 15:36 ` Frank Li
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvmem: imx-ocotp-ele: Add keepout table for i.MX93 Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvmem: imx-ocotp-ele: Remove device-specific reg_read() Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvmem: imx-ocotp-ele: Support the ELE API Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:13 ` Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvmem: imx-ocotp-ele: Remove the FUSE_ELE type Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvmem: imx-ocotp-ele: Rename FSB access map Frieder Schrempf
2026-06-16 11:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: imx93-kontron: Enable ELE firmware driver Frieder Schrempf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616120609.E7C3B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frieder@fris.de \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox