From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: joakim.zhang@cixtech.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 resend 2/5] reset: cix: add audss support to sky1 reset driver
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 06:50:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617065026.830301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617064100.1504617-3-joakim.zhang@cixtech.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] The reset controller operations access hardware registers via regmap without ensuring the reset controller device is active, leading to potential system crashes.
- [High] The reset controller is registered before its underlying hardware (NOC reset) is fully initialized and deasserted, creating a race condition that can cause a bus hang.
- [High] The return value of `reset_control_deassert()` is unchecked, which can lead to silent hardware failures and subsequent bus hangs.
- [Medium] Using asynchronous `pm_runtime_put()` on the probe error path races with `pm_runtime_disable()`, leaving the hardware active and the reset improperly deasserted.
- [Low] The `dev_pm_ops` structure is assigned unconditionally without the `pm_ptr()` wrapper, generating dead code when PM support is disabled.
--
commit 44fbafef81df1536ade6d0fdca4767f4c7fc1234
Author: Joakim Zhang <joakim.zhang@cixtech.com>
Subject: reset: cix: add audss support to sky1 reset driver
This commit extends the Sky1 reset controller driver for the AUDSS CRU syscon.
It adds support for sixteen active-low software reset bits for audio subsystem
peripherals, reusing the existing regmap-based reset operations.
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sky1.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sky1.c
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sky1.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sky1.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -343,21 +379,65 @@ static int sky1_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sky1src->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> sky1src->rcdev.dev = dev;
>
> - return devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &sky1src->rcdev);
> + ret = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &sky1src->rcdev);
[Severity: High]
Is it safe to register the reset controller globally before the AUDSS NoC
reset is deasserted?
If a consumer driver attempting to probe or wake up concurrently tries to
assert or deassert a reset line, could the regmap MMIO access stall the bus
and trigger a synchronous external abort because the AUDSS NoC is still held
in reset?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sky1src);
> +
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "cix,sky1-audss-system-control")) {
> + sky1src->rst_noc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(sky1src->rst_noc))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(sky1src->rst_noc),
> + "failed to get audss noc reset");
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> + devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +
> + reset_control_deassert(sky1src->rst_noc);
[Severity: High]
Can reset_control_deassert() fail and return an error code?
If it fails and leaves the NoC in reset, will devm_of_platform_populate()
attempting to probe children over a blocked NoC cause a bus stall or
system crash? Should the return value be checked and propagated here?
> +
> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
[Severity: Medium]
Does using asynchronous pm_runtime_put() on the error path risk a race with
pm_runtime_disable() which is called during devres cleanup?
If devm_of_platform_populate() fails, the probe function returns an error and
devres will immediately disable PM runtime. This could cancel the pending
async suspend work, meaning sky1_reset_runtime_suspend() might be skipped,
leaking rst_noc in a deasserted state.
Would using pm_runtime_put_sync() ensure the hardware is properly suspended
before cleanup continues?
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops sky1_reset_pm_ops = {
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(sky1_reset_runtime_suspend, sky1_reset_runtime_resume, NULL)
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
> +};
[Severity: Critical]
Now that PM runtime support is added and the AUDSS variant's NoC reset can be
asserted during runtime suspend, do the existing reset controller operations
(sky1_reset_assert, sky1_reset_deassert, and sky1_reset_status) need to call
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() before performing regmap accesses?
If a consumer driver toggles a reset line while this controller is runtime
suspended, will the raw MMIO write to a block held in NOC reset cause a
synchronous external abort?
> +
> static struct platform_driver sky1_reset_driver = {
> .probe = sky1_reset_probe,
> .driver = {
> .name = "cix,sky1-rst",
> .of_match_table = sky1_sysreg_of_match,
> + .pm = &sky1_reset_pm_ops,
[Severity: Low]
If CONFIG_PM is disabled, will this unconditional assignment cause
sky1_reset_pm_ops and its callbacks to be compiled but unreachable,
generating dead code?
Should this assignment be wrapped with pm_ptr() to align with standard
Power Management subsystem guidelines?
> },
> };
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617064100.1504617-1-joakim.zhang@cixtech.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 6:40 [PATCH v4 resend 0/5] Add Cix Sky1 AUDSS clock and reset support joakim.zhang
2026-06-17 6:40 ` [PATCH v4 resend 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: cix,sky1-system-control: add audss system control joakim.zhang
2026-06-17 9:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-17 6:40 ` [PATCH v4 resend 2/5] reset: cix: add audss support to sky1 reset driver joakim.zhang
2026-06-17 6:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-17 6:40 ` [PATCH v4 resend 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: cix,sky1-audss-clock: add audss clock controller joakim.zhang
2026-06-17 9:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-17 6:40 ` [PATCH v4 resend 4/5] clk: cix: add sky1 " joakim.zhang
2026-06-17 6:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 6:41 ` [PATCH v4 resend 5/5] arm64: dts: cix: sky1: add audss system control joakim.zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617065026.830301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joakim.zhang@cixtech.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox