Re: [PATCH V13 8/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Gyroscope to icm42607

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:52:36 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 04:10:49PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 01:13:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:  
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:25:51PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > Can be some of the code deduplicated between gyro and accel?  
> > 
> > Probably a fair amount, but the deduplication will likely need to be
> > undone somewhat if we get buffer, WoM or apex support added back
> > (I don't have any devices with such functionality, so if anyone will
> > do it then it won't be me). I can refactor more if you want, or we
> > can keep it split like this to make it easy if someone else wants to
> > tackle the buffers/IRQs stuff later? Your call.  
> 
> Just asking. Jonathan, David, Nuno, what's your opinion on this?
> Personal opinion is to avoid solving the issues that do not exist.
> If you are not committing into those features, let's not prepare
> driver for them right now.
> 
Agreed.  My only exception to this is normally when someone tells
me they have the code and plan to post a follow up set very shortly.
Then I get a bit more relaxed as they chances of 'preparing' for the
future being relevant become much higher!

Jonathan