From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Add follow-up bridge support
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:49:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623194922.4F4BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612-synopsys-dw-dp-improvements-v3-3-dc61e6352508@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Memory leak of the follow-up bridge reference count.
- [High] Unconditional probe failure causing DT backward compatibility breakage.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing completion reinitialization causes race conditions with stale completion states during AUX transfers.
- [High] Premature registration and exposure of the DP AUX channel to userspace before hardware and IRQ initialization.
--
commit ceef3e5c9dcfb09773dad5a727e1e2147c87f8e5
Author: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Add follow-up bridge support
Add support to use USB-C connectors with the DP altmode helper code on
devicetree based platforms. To get this working there must be a DRM bridge
chain from the DisplayPort controller to the USB-C connector.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-dp.c
> index ac7779e42bb24..98cff435dfb87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-dp.c
> @@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ struct dw_dp *dw_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct dw_dp *dp;
> - struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge, *next_bridge;
> void __iomem *res;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -2064,6 +2064,20 @@ struct dw_dp *dw_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> goto unregister_aux;
> }
>
> + next_bridge = of_drm_get_bridge_by_endpoint(dev->of_node, 1, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(next_bridge)) {
[Severity: High]
Can this unconditional check break device tree backward compatibility?
By making the absence of a follow-up bridge a fatal error instead of an
optional configuration, this appears to cause the display driver to
completely fail to probe on existing platforms that do not define a downstream
bridge endpoint in their device tree.
> + ret = PTR_ERR(next_bridge);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get follow-up bridge.\n");
> + goto unregister_aux;
> + }
> +
> + ret = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, next_bridge, bridge,
> + DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
[Severity: High]
Does this code leak the next_bridge reference?
Calling of_drm_get_bridge_by_endpoint() increments the reference count of the
returned bridge, but there doesn't seem to be a corresponding drm_bridge_put()
on either the success or error paths to release it.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to attach next bridge\n");
> + goto unregister_aux;
> + }
> +
> dw_dp_init_hw(dp);
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does registering the AUX channel early
expose uninitialized hardware to userspace?
Looking earlier in dw_dp_bind():
ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&dp->aux);
if (ret) {
dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Aux register failed\n");
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
And then later:
dw_dp_init_hw(dp);
ret = phy_init(dp->phy);
If a userspace process opens the AUX character device and initiates a
transaction before dw_dp_init_hw() and the IRQ setup are called, the hardware
may enter an invalid state and miss completion interrupts.
> ret = phy_init(dp->phy);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the lack of completion reinitialization
cause race conditions?
Looking at dw_dp_aux_transfer() in the same file:
regmap_write(dp->regmap, DW_DP_AUX_CMD, value);
status = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dp->complete, timeout);
If a previous AUX transfer timed out but the hardware eventually triggered a
late interrupt, the completion object will remain in a done state. The next
AUX transfer will see this stale state, causing wait_for_completion_timeout()
to return immediately before the new transfer has actually completed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612-synopsys-dw-dp-improvements-v3-0-dc61e6352508@collabora.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 18:00 [PATCH v3 00/10] Synopsys DisplayPort Controller improvements for Rockchip platforms Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Simplify driver data setting Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Support MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Add follow-up bridge support Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 19:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/bridge: Add out-of-band HPD notify handler Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Support software triggered OOB HPD Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/rockchip: dw_dp: Implement out-of-band HPD handling Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 20:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Add Runtime PM support Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/rockchip: dw_dp: Add runtime " Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/10] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: dw-dp: fix sound DAI cells Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 20:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/bridge: synopsys: dw-dp: Add audio support Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-23 21:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623194922.4F4BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox