Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/rockchip: vop2: Avoid DCLK source switch for 10-bit YUV422 output
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:33:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623203310.9F8C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617-dw-hdmi-qp-yuv-v1-3-a665cfd06d7d@collabora.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Division by zero in max_dclk calculation due to uninitialized output_bpc.
- [High] Integer overflow in max_dclk calculation on 32-bit architectures.
- [High] Atomic context violation due to calling sleeping functions.
--

commit cdb8cbbc3fd201db3157d6704b3856b8565e10e2
Author: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>

drm/rockchip: vop2: Avoid DCLK source switch for 10-bit YUV422 output
    
The commit modifies the DCLK source decision logic for HDMI output in VOP2.
It prevents unnecessary switching of the DCLK source to the system CRU for
10-bit YUV422 output by forcing the bandwidth check to 8 bpc.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> index 2833fb49ad81a..17d21e08ad977 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> @@ -1922,8 +1922,17 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function violate atomic context
rules?

According to the DRM subsystem guidelines, CRTC atomic enable callbacks execute
in atomic context where sleeping is forbidden. However, vop2_crtc_atomic_enable()
acquires a mutex via vop2_lock() and later calls clk_prepare_enable(), both of
which can sleep.

Can this cause scheduling while atomic warnings or deadlocks during atomic
commits?

>  	 * to 4K@60Hz, if available, otherwise keep using the system CRU.
>  	 */
>  	if (vop2->pll_hdmiphy0 || vop2->pll_hdmiphy1) {
> -		unsigned long max_dclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE * 8,
> -							       vcstate->output_bpc);
> +		/*
> +		 * YUV422 always transmits two 12-bit components per clock
> +		 * cycle, regardless of the color depth, which from a rate
> +		 * perspective is equivalent to three 8-bit RGB components.
> +		 * Force 8 bpc here so the bandwidth check reflects the actual
> +		 * TMDS rate and avoids an unnecessary DCLK source switch.
> +		 */
> +		unsigned int bpc = vcstate->output_mode == ROCKCHIP_OUT_MODE_YUV422 ?
> +					8 : vcstate->output_bpc;
> +		unsigned long max_dclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE * 8, bpc);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can bpc be 0 here and cause a
division by zero?

If the VOP2 driver is used with a non-HDMI output like DSI or LVDS on a board
that also has an HDMI PHY, vop2->pll_hdmiphy0 or vop2->pll_hdmiphy1 will be
non-NULL. Since DSI/LVDS encoders do not set vcstate->output_bpc, it defaults
to 0.

This would lead to DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(..., 0) before the loop checks if
the endpoint is HDMI.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE * 8 overflow on
32-bit architectures?

VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE is defined as 600000000UL. On architectures where
unsigned long is 32 bits, 600000000UL * 8 equals 4,800,000,000, which exceeds
ULONG_MAX.

This truncates to 505,032,704 before being promoted to unsigned long long inside
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL, improperly forcing higher resolutions to fall back to the
system CRU.

Should this be cast to a 64-bit type first, such as VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE * 8ULL?

>  		if (clock <= max_dclk) {
>  			drm_for_each_encoder_mask(encoder, crtc->dev, crtc_state->encoder_mask) {
>  				struct rockchip_encoder *rkencoder = to_rockchip_encoder(encoder);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617-dw-hdmi-qp-yuv-v1-0-a665cfd06d7d@collabora.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-17 18:51 [PATCH 0/9] Support 10-bit YUV422 and 8/10-bit YUV420 color format on DW HDMI QP Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add missing reset properties Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-18  7:58   ` Diederik de Haas
2026-06-18  8:39     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-22 13:25   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/rockchip: vop2: Reset AXI and DCLK to improve robustness Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-18  9:39   ` Philipp Zabel
2026-06-18 11:46     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-18 11:52       ` Philipp Zabel
2026-06-23 20:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/rockchip: vop2: Avoid DCLK source switch for 10-bit YUV422 output Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-23 20:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/rockchip: vop2: Consolidate HDMI PHY PLL clock parent switch Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-23 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/rockchip: vop2: Switch to enum vop_csc_format Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi-qp: Log resolution and refresh rate in atomic_enable() Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi_qp: Support 10-bit YUV422 output format Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-23 20:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi_qp: Enable YUV420 " Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-06-23 21:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3588 VOP2 resets Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623203310.9F8C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox