From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jie Gan" <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 06:49:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624064943.22B5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v1-1-bcc785198fc5@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Switching traceNoC to the platform itnoc driver breaks trace enablement for connected sources.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Probe error path unconditionally invokes PM runtime suspend, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
- [Medium] Driver removal and unbind paths cause a clock enable count underflow warning.
--
commit 152b245041f20740bb96bedaa8fe0632753867d1
Author: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue
This commit fixes probing of the traceNoC device by switching from the AMBA
bus to the platform itnoc driver.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
> index 7aa9653bd456e..84561b5faf811 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
> @@ -5003,12 +5003,12 @@ tpdm_pcie_rscc_out: endpoint {
> };
> };
>
> - tn@111b8000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,coresight-tnoc", "arm,primecell";
> + itnoc@111b8000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,coresight-itnoc";
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does switching to the platform driver expose
a NULL pointer dereference if probing fails?
If _tnoc_probe() fails in itnoc_probe(), the code unconditionally calls
pm_runtime_put() before drvdata is fully initialized. This triggers:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:itnoc_runtime_suspend() {
struct trace_noc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->pclk);
}
Could this dereference a NULL drvdata during the error path?
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does using the itnoc driver
lead to a clock enable count underflow on unbind?
The clock is fetched with managed enablement in _tnoc_probe():
ret = coresight_get_enable_clocks(dev, &drvdata->pclk, NULL);
This registers a devres cleanup action. However, the driver also manages the
clock manually:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:itnoc_runtime_suspend() {
clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->pclk);
}
If the driver is unbound while in a runtime-suspended state, will the devres
framework attempt to disable the already-disabled clock?
[Severity: High]
Will changing the compatible string without "arm,primecell" break trace
enablement for connected sources like TPDM?
When probed as a platform device, the driver initializes atid to unsupported:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:trace_noc_init_default_data() {
if (!dev_is_amba(drvdata->dev)) {
drvdata->atid = -EOPNOTSUPP;
return 0;
}
}
During trace enablement, coresight_path_assign_trace_id() could fail because
-EOPNOTSUPP is evaluated as an invalid trace ID:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:coresight_path_assign_trace_id() {
if (!IS_VALID_CS_TRACE_ID(trace_id))
return -EINVAL;
}
Does this immediately abort trace enablement for any source relying on this
traceNoC?
> reg = <0x0 0x111b8000 0x0 0x4200>;
>
> clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
> - clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> + clock-names = "apb";
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v1-1-bcc785198fc5@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 6:33 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue Jie Gan
2026-06-24 6:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-24 8:56 ` Jie Gan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624064943.22B5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox