From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] iio: adc: ltc2378: Enable triggered buffer data capture
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:00:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625150059.EEDD41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a98804f122b7c1d1c159ba20060a250ebe2caaed.1782397418.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Single reads via sysfs (`in_voltage0_raw`) return scrambled/garbage data when the SPI offload engine is configured, because they incorrectly use the offload channel's endianness and shift properties.
--
commit 5a2926870e368170637e86d31e6346617e37a6b1
Author: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
iio: adc: ltc2378: Enable triggered buffer data capture
Enable users to run triggered data captures with LTC2378 and similar ADCs.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2378.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2378.c
> index 5b28630003b18..fcccd27745490 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2378.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2378.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -640,8 +662,16 @@ static int ltc2378_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> /* Fall back to low speed usage when no SPI offload is available. */
> if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> indio_dev->info = <c2378_iio_info;
> - indio_dev->channels = &st->info->chan;
> - indio_dev->num_channels = 1;
> + indio_dev->channels = st->info->chan;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(st->info->chan);
> +
> + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
> + iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> + ltc2378_trigger_handler,
> + NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "failed to setup triggered buffer\n");
> } else if (ret) {
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get offload\n");
> } else {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do single reads via sysfs
(in_voltage0_raw) return scrambled data when the SPI offload engine is
configured?
When offload is configured, indio_dev->channels is assigned to the
offload channel just after this else block in ltc2378_probe():
indio_dev->channels = &st->info->offload_chan;
This channel specification is later passed to ltc2378_channel_single_read().
However, the single read function relies on the channel's endianness and
shift properties to decode the raw SPI data:
static int ltc2378_channel_single_read(const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, ...)
{
...
if (chan->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE) {
if (chan->scan_type.realbits > 16)
sample = be32_to_cpu(st->scan.data.sample_buf32_be);
else
sample = be16_to_cpu(st->scan.data.sample_buf16_be);
} else {
if (chan->scan_type.realbits > 16)
sample = st->scan.data.sample_buf32;
else
sample = st->scan.data.sample_buf16;
}
sample >>= chan->scan_type.shift;
...
}
Because the offload_chan specification defines data as CPU-endian with
a 0 shift, the else branch is taken. This treats the natively big-endian,
MSB-aligned SPI data as unshifted CPU-endian data, scrambling the values on
little-endian architectures.
Could this be updated to properly handle manual sysfs reads when offload
is enabled?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1782397418.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 14:34 [PATCH v4 0/4] iio: adc: Add support for LTC2378 and similar ADCs Marcelo Schmitt
2026-06-25 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add ltc2378 Marcelo Schmitt
2026-06-25 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 14:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] iio: adc: ltc2378: Add support for LTC2378-20 and similar ADCs Marcelo Schmitt
2026-06-25 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 14:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] iio: adc: ltc2378: Enable high-speed data capture Marcelo Schmitt
2026-06-25 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 14:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] iio: adc: ltc2378: Enable triggered buffer " Marcelo Schmitt
2026-06-25 15:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625150059.EEDD41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox