From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jie Gan" <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: fix traceNoC probe issue
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:19:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630111901.B1D5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v3-4-7201e1841e94@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Leaked coresight trace ID on driver unbind for platform devices.
- [Medium] Unconditional free of trace ID in AMBA remove triggers WARN on unallocated IDs.
--
commit 95ddd2ab120783ca669e4302a341bf092ecf6485
Author: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: fix traceNoC probe issue
The traceNoC node used the "qcom,coresight-tnoc", "arm,primecell"
compatible, which places the device on the AMBA bus. The AMBA peripheral
ID probing fails on this platform, so the device never probes.
Switch the node to the standalone "qcom,coresight-agtnoc" compatible.
Dropping "arm,primecell" makes the device probe through the platform
driver instead of the AMBA bus, which resolves the probe failure while
keeping it an Aggregator TNOC that retains ATID functionality.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> @@ -4687,7 +4687,7 @@ tpdm_rdpm_cmb2_out: endpoint {
> };
>
> tn@109ab000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,coresight-tnoc", "arm,primecell";
> + compatible = "qcom,coresight-agtnoc";
[Severity: High]
Does switching to the platform driver probe path introduce a trace ID leak on
device unbind?
When the device probes via the platform driver due to this compatible string
change, _tnoc_probe() calls trace_noc_init_default_data() which successfully
allocates a trace ID via coresight_trace_id_get_system_id().
However, looking at the driver's platform remove callback:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:tnoc_platform_remove() {
struct trace_noc_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
}
The allocated system trace ID is never released via
coresight_trace_id_put_system_id(). Will this eventually exhaust the globally
limited pool of hardware trace IDs if the driver is unbound?
[Severity: Medium]
For configurations that still probe via the AMBA bus (retaining the
"arm,primecell" compatible), does the AMBA remove callback unconditionally free
unallocated trace IDs?
If a device node uses a compatible that results in atid being assigned
-EOPNOTSUPP, the _tnoc_probe() error path safely checks if (drvdata->atid > 0)
before freeing it. However, trace_noc_remove() does not:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:trace_noc_remove() {
struct trace_noc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);
coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
coresight_trace_id_put_system_id(drvdata->atid);
}
Because coresight_trace_id_free() validates the ID and fires a kernel WARN if
it is invalid, will this trigger a warning during AMBA device unbind?
> reg = <0x0 0x109ab000 0x0 0x4200>;
>
> clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v3-0-7201e1841e94@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 10:36 [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix traceNoC probe issue on multiple QCOM platforms Jie Gan
2026-06-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: coresight-tnoc: Add standalone qcom,coresight-agtnoc compatible Jie Gan
2026-06-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] coresight: tnoc: Add AG tnoc standalone compatible to the platform driver Jie Gan
2026-06-30 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:59 ` Jie Gan
2026-06-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue Jie Gan
2026-06-30 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 12:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-30 13:44 ` Jie Gan
2026-06-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Jie Gan
2026-06-30 11:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: use Aggregator TNOC compatible Jie Gan
2026-06-30 11:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630111901.B1D5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox