From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Trumtrar" <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov: support new 7inch panel board
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:45:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701084500.AC7351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701-v7-0-topic-imx8mp-skov-dts-jutouch-7inch-v3-2-d74f7e3f8293@pengutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] DT Schema Validation Failure: missing fallback compatible string for touchscreen.
- [Low] Documentation error in LVDS clock calculation comment.
- [Low] Makefile Ordering Violation.
--
commit 3b909b83ea0bf98186df799556b414671ad39311
Author: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov: support new 7inch panel board
This board is similar to the already upstream
imx8mp-skov-revc-tian-g07017.dts but uses a different 7" panel with a
different touch controller.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
> index 8ddaab127ab9c..efca29735b2cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
[ ... ]
> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revb-mi1010ait-1cp1.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revc-bd500.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revc-hdmi.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revc-tian-g07017.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revc-jutouch-jt070tm041.dtb
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but should this new entry be sorted alphabetically?
Placing jutouch after tian breaks the expected ordering in the Makefile.
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-skov-revc-jutouch-jt101tm023.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8mp-toradex-smarc-dev.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-skov-revc-jutouch-jt070tm041.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-skov-revc-jutouch-jt070tm041.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..56374f1e67663
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-skov-revc-jutouch-jt070tm041.dts
[ ... ]
> +&i2c2 {
> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + touchscreen@2a {
> + compatible = "eeti,exc81w32";
[Severity: Low]
Does this compatible string also require the fallback string eeti,exc80h84
to pass dtbs_check validation? The schema for the eeti,exc3000 touchscreen
typically expects both strings to be present.
> + reg = <0x2a>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_touchscreen>;
[ ... ]
> +&lvds_bridge {
> + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_LDB>,
> + <&clk IMX8MP_VIDEO_PLL1>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MP_VIDEO_PLL1_OUT>;
> + /* IMX8MP_VIDEO_PLL1 = IMX8MP_CLK_MEDIA_DISP2_PIX * 2 * 7 */
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but is the * 2 multiplier in this comment correct?
With the single-link pixel clock of 51.2 MHz for this panel and the assigned
rate of 358400000 Hz, the calculation appears to be exactly 51.2 MHz * 7.
Including the * 2 multiplier would result in 716.8 MHz instead.
> + assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <358400000>;
> + status = "okay";
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-v7-0-topic-imx8mp-skov-dts-jutouch-7inch-v3-0-d74f7e3f8293@pengutronix.de?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 8:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov: add new 7" variant Steffen Trumtrar
2026-07-01 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add compatible for new Skov I.MX8MP variant Steffen Trumtrar
2026-07-01 17:07 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-01 8:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp-skov: support new 7inch panel board Steffen Trumtrar
2026-07-01 8:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 15:00 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701084500.AC7351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox