From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: Split r5f memory region
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:30:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701133029.524D51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701-topic-am62a-ioddr-dt-v6-19-v7-10-e9db8b16821a@baylibre.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Splitting the contiguous firmware memory region into multiple smaller segments breaks ELF loading for existing monolithic firmwares.
--
commit 467b992dbc807cab9f7fc93edfad5b8ea8a2207c
Author: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) <msp@baylibre.com>
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: Split r5f memory region
This commit splits the contiguous firmware memory region into more
specific parts. It explicitly describes where to find LPM metadata
and other regions for bootloaders like U-Boot.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi
> index f776511095642..8f7409da83392 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi
> @@ -24,9 +24,33 @@ wkup_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: memory@9c800000 {
> no-map;
> };
>
> - wkup_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: memory@9c900000 {
> + wkup_r5fss0_core0_ipc_region: memory@9c900000 {
> compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> - reg = <0x00 0x9c900000 0x00 0x01d08000>;
> + reg = <0x00 0x9c900000 0x00 0x100000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
[Severity: High]
Will splitting this contiguous memory region into smaller fragmented regions
break ELF loading for existing monolithic firmwares?
When the remoteproc driver loads the firmware via rproc_elf_load_segments(),
k3_rproc_da_to_va() translates the addresses by checking each DT region
independently. It strictly requires the entire segment to fit within a single
memory region:
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c:k3_rproc_da_to_va() {
...
if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
offset = da - dev_addr;
...
}
If an older firmware has a segment that is larger than the newly defined
boundaries, such as a segment crossing the 1MB ipc region and the 32KB
lpm-stub region, this translation returns NULL and causes an -EINVAL error.
Furthermore, because the driver maps each of these memory regions
independently, the kernel virtual addresses are disjoint:
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c:k3_reserved_mem_init() {
...
kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource_wc(dev, &res);
...
}
Could this result in a Device Tree ABI regression for existing users with
older monolithic firmwares?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-topic-am62a-ioddr-dt-v6-19-v7-0-e9db8b16821a@baylibre.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 12:39 [PATCH v7 00/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Split r5f memory region Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-phycore-som: Fix wkup R5F memory region size Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-verdin: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] arm64: dts: ti: var-som-am62p: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-ti-ipc-firmware: Move wkup reserved memory Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-ti-ipc-firmware: Split r5f memory region Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 13:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: " Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
2026-07-01 13:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: Add r5f nodes to pre-ram bootphase Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701133029.524D51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox