Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] block: implement NVMEM provider
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 13:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704134554.D6C411F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703-block-as-nvmem-v8-5-98ae32bfc49a@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The NVMEM provider incorrectly sets `config.owner = THIS_MODULE`, failing to pin the underlying block device driver module and causing a Use-After-Free if the driver module is unloaded while a consumer holds an NVMEM cell.
--

commit 658c388a96462e54e252d777f2fc96dcf4f36d59
Author: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>

block: implement NVMEM provider

This patch allows block devices or partitions to act as NVMEM providers,
exposing factory-provisioned data such as MAC addresses or Wi-Fi calibration
blobs. It introduces blk_nvmem_add to register the block device with the
NVMEM framework when the appropriate device tree nodes are present.

> diff --git a/block/blk-nvmem.c b/block/blk-nvmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..642a12f8a8b1c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/block/blk-nvmem.c

[ ... ]

> +int blk_nvmem_add(struct block_device *bdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &bdev->bd_device;
> +	struct nvmem_config config = {};
> +	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;

[ ... ]

> +	config.id = NVMEM_DEVID_NONE;
> +	config.dev = dev;
> +	config.name = dev_name(dev);
> +	config.owner = THIS_MODULE;

[Severity: High]
Should this owner be set to the block device driver's module, such as
bdev->bd_disk->fops->owner, instead of THIS_MODULE?

By setting config.owner to THIS_MODULE, it seems we pin the block core
module but fail to protect the actual block device driver (like mmc_block)
from being unloaded while a consumer still holds a reference to the NVMEM
cell. 

If the driver module is unloaded, its module memory is freed. When the
consumer later releases the cell and the bd_device refcount drops to zero,
could disk_release() end up calling disk->fops->free_disk on a now-unmapped
driver module pointer and cause a crash?

> +	config.priv = (void *)(uintptr_t)dev->devt;
> +	config.reg_read = blk_nvmem_reg_read;
> +	config.size = bdev_nr_bytes(bdev);

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260703-block-as-nvmem-v8-0-98ae32bfc49a@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-04 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 13:45 [PATCH v8 0/9] Support for block device NVMEM providers Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] dt-bindings: mmc: Document fixed-layout NVMEM provider support Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] dt-bindings: net: wireless: qcom,ath10k: Document NVMEM cells Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qcom: Add NVMEM BD address cell Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] nvmem: layouts: Support fixed-layout as the nvmem device node itself Loic Poulain
2026-07-04 13:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] block: implement NVMEM provider Loic Poulain
2026-07-04 13:45   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] net: of_net: Add of_get_nvmem_eui48() helper for EUI-48 lookup Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Add NVMEM-backed BD address retrieval Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] Bluetooth: qca: Set NVMEM BD address quirks when address is invalid Loic Poulain
2026-07-03 13:45 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses Loic Poulain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260704134554.D6C411F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox