From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pengyu Luo" <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT36536
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 15:44:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260705154441.2D2CB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260705153515.46147-2-mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incorrect use of `additionalProperties: false` instead of `unevaluatedProperties: false` in a schema containing an `allOf` reference.
--
commit 40b975ec362c58607cb7c58d87a808388df1aa11
Author: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT36536
This commit adds a new devicetree binding schema for the Novatek NT36536 DSI
panel IC, which supports video mode panels like the dual-link 10-bit CSOT
PP8807HB1-1.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt36536.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt36536.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..1e86f5329b222
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt36536.yaml
[ ... ]
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: panel-common-dual.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
[ ... ]
> + vsn-supply:
> + description: Negative source voltage rail
> +
> + backlight: true
> + ports: true
[Severity: Low]
Should these properties be omitted? They are already defined in the referenced
common schemas and appear to be redundantly redefined here solely because of
how additionalProperties is evaluated below.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - vddio-supply
> + - reset-gpios
> + - ports
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Low]
Does this directive incorrectly restrict the schema since there is an allOf
reference above? Using additionalProperties: false will cause dtbs_check to
reject valid board configurations that use standard panel properties defined in
panel-common-dual.yaml and panel-common.yaml (such as rotation or width-mm).
Should this be changed to unevaluatedProperties: false instead? Once that is
corrected, the redundant backlight and ports entries above can likely be
removed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705153515.46147-1-mitltlatltl@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 15:35 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/panel: Add Novatek NT36536 panel driver Pengyu Luo
2026-07-05 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT36536 Pengyu Luo
2026-07-05 15:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-05 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: Add Novatek NT36536 panel driver Pengyu Luo
2026-07-05 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260705154441.2D2CB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mitltlatltl@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox