From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/5] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 19:40:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260705194011.AC7D31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260704-ks8995-to-ksz8-v7-4-2af0eaa545a8@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 7 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Uninitialized Stack Variables Corrupt Hardware Registers
- [Critical] MAC Header Corruption on Receive via Misuse of skb_vlan_untag
- [High] Incorrect Register Polarity for MTU Configuration on KSZ8995XA
- [High] Loss of VLAN Tags and Broken 802.1AD Routing on Egress
- [High] Hardware PVID Leaks into Host Network Stack for Untagged Packets
- [High] Invalid PHY Soft Reset on CPU Port Targets Reserved/MAC Registers
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] SPI Device Tree Flags Discarded by Unconditional Mode Overwrite
--
commit 0676ac96adf5e00a23c99f1617beebb88d95ead0
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Subject: net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA
This adds support for the Microchip KSZ8995XA also known as the Micrel
KS8995XA switch to the KSZ driver. It includes specific register
definitions, switch operations, and compatibility configurations.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Kconfig b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Kconfig
> index c71d3fd5dfeb8..75c9b2114afd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> menuconfig NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_COMMON
> tristate "Microchip KSZ8XXX/KSZ9XXX/LAN937X series switch support"
> depends on NET_DSA
> + select NET_DSA_TAG_KS8995
[Severity: Critical]
Looking at ks8995_rcv() in net/dsa/tag_ks8995.c which this config enables,
it calls skb_vlan_untag(skb). At this point, the DSA core has pulled the
Ethernet MAC header, so skb->data points to the MAC destination address,
not the VLAN header.
Does this unconditionally read the MAC destination address as a VLAN header,
extract a garbage TCI, and pull 4 bytes, stripping half the MAC address?
[Severity: High]
Also looking at ks8995_xmit() in net/dsa/tag_ks8995.c, if the packet has an
802.1Q payload tag, the driver overwrites its TPID with the DSA routing tag
via hdr->h_vlan_proto = KS8995M_STPID(portmask).
Since the switch is configured with PORT_REMOVE_TAG on external ports, will
this cause it to strip this single tag on egress and transmit the packet
untagged, resulting in a loss of 802.1Q VLAN tags?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
> index 586916570a841..03a5981a6315c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.c
> @@ -137,7 +138,17 @@ static int ksz8_pme_pwrite8(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, int offset, u8 dat
>
> static int ksz8_reset_switch(struct ksz_device *dev)
> {
> - if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev)) {
> + if (ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev)) {
> + unsigned int port;
> +
> + /* The KSZ8995XA switch itself cannot be reset by software, but
> + * often boot loaders have fun with ports, so reset them. This
> + * reset bit is self-clearing.
> + */
> + for (port = 0; port < dev->info->port_cnt; port++)
> + ksz_port_cfg(dev, port, REG_PORT_STATUS_3,
> + PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET, true);
[Severity: High]
This loop in ksz8_reset_switch() iterates over all ports, including the
CPU port which lacks an internal PHY. Could writing PORT_PHY_SOFT_RESET to
REG_PORT_STATUS_3 (0x0F) on the CPU port target reserved or MAC control
registers and cause hardware initialization failures?
> + } else if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev)) {
> /* reset switch */
> ksz_cfg(dev, KSZ8863_REG_SW_RESET,
> KSZ8863_GLOBAL_SOFTWARE_RESET | KSZ8863_PCS_RESET, true);
[ ... ]
> @@ -161,8 +172,14 @@ static int ksz8_reset_switch(struct ksz_device *dev)
> static int ksz8863_change_mtu(struct ksz_device *dev, int frame_size)
> {
> u8 ctrl2 = 0;
> + unsigned int legalsz;
> +
> + if (ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev))
> + legalsz = KSZ8995XA_LEGAL_PACKET_SIZE;
> + else
> + legalsz = KSZ8_LEGAL_PACKET_SIZE;
>
> - if (frame_size <= KSZ8_LEGAL_PACKET_SIZE)
> + if (frame_size <= legalsz)
> ctrl2 |= KSZ8863_LEGAL_PACKET_ENABLE;
[Severity: High]
Does ksz8863_change_mtu() apply inverted BIT(1) logic for MTU limits on the
KSZ8995XA?
For small MTUs 1522 bytes or less, the driver sets BIT(1) of REG_SW_CTRL_2.
On the KSZ8863 this enables the size limit, but on KSZ8995XA, BIT(1)
represents SW_LEGAL_PACKET_DISABLE and disables the limit. Could this cause
valid packets to be dropped while huge packets bypass the size limit?
[ ... ]
> @@ -242,6 +260,10 @@ static int ksz8_port_queue_split(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, int queues)
> mask_2q = KSZ8873_PORT_2QUEUE_SPLIT_EN;
> reg_4q = P1CR1;
> reg_2q = P1CR1 + 1;
> + } else if (ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev)) {
> + /* This switch has no 4way split support */
> + mask_2q = KSZ8795_PORT_2QUEUE_SPLIT_EN;
> + reg_2q = REG_PORT_CTRL_0;
> } else {
> mask_4q = KSZ8795_PORT_4QUEUE_SPLIT_EN;
> mask_2q = KSZ8795_PORT_2QUEUE_SPLIT_EN;
[Severity: Critical]
When ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev) is true in ksz8_port_queue_split(), do we use
uninitialized reg_4q and mask_4q variables?
The function unconditionally passes them to ksz_prmw8() later on. Could this
perform a read-modify-write on a garbage I/O register address using a
garbage mask?
[ ... ]
> @@ -2061,13 +2126,17 @@ static int ksz8_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> struct ksz_port *p;
> const u16 *regs;
> int i, ret;
> + u8 val;
>
> regs = dev->info->regs;
>
> - dev->vlan_cache = devm_kcalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(struct vlan_table),
> - dev->info->num_vlans, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dev->vlan_cache)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + /* KSZ8995XA has no SW controlled VLAN handling */
> + if (!ksz_is_ksz8995xa(dev)) {
> + dev->vlan_cache = devm_kcalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(struct vlan_table),
> + dev->info->num_vlans, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev->vlan_cache)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
[Severity: High]
By skipping VLAN initialization here in ksz8_setup(), the hardware PVID is
never cleared to 0.
In net/dsa/tag_ks8995.c, ks8995_rcv() uses a check for !skb->vlan_tci to
identify originally untagged packets. Does this mean the switch will insert
its non-zero hardware default PVID into untagged packets, causing them to be
erroneously presented to the network stack as 802.1Q VLAN tagged packets?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c
> index 77aecac324667..2c55014246e5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c
> @@ -185,7 +186,10 @@ static int ksz_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> dev->pdata = spi->dev.platform_data;
>
> /* setup spi */
> - spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> + if (chip->chip_id == KSZ8995XA_CHIP_ID)
> + spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
> + else
> + spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> ret = spi_setup(spi);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by unconditionally assigning spi->mode
here in ksz_spi_probe(), does it discard all SPI bus flags configured by
the SPI subsystem based on Device Tree properties (such as spi-cs-high
or spi-3wire)?
This could break SPI communication on boards requiring non-default
polarities or phases.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260704-ks8995-to-ksz8-v7-0-2af0eaa545a8@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-04 19:39 [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for KSZ8995XA/KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-07-04 19:39 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] net: dsa: microchip: Add fallback Micrel compatibles Linus Walleij
2026-07-05 19:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 19:39 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-07-04 19:39 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/5] net: dsa: tag_ks8995: Add the KS8995 tag handling Linus Walleij
2026-07-05 19:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 19:39 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/5] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-07-05 19:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-04 19:39 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/5] net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver Linus Walleij
2026-07-05 19:40 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260705194011.AC7D31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox