From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ahmed Tiba" <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:19:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708141940.75EA51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-topics-ahmtib01-ras_ffh_arm_internal_review-v7-4-8b3a85216cef@arm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Malicious hardware or firmware can cause a memory leak in the fixed-size `ghes_estatus_pool` by reducing the CPER error status length between the peek and full read operations.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v7 04/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers ---
commit 838eea76a409eda9e1dc7c8c377f46dbbbad493c
Author: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers
This patch relocates the estatus cache allocation and lookup helpers from
ghes.c into ghes_cper.c. It also fixes a bug in ghes_estatus_cache_add()
to avoid memory leaks and counter exhaustion.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h b/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> index 4649e3140888c..15305c8be9a74 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
> ((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *) \
> ((struct ghes_vendor_record_entry *)(vendor_entry) + 1))
>
> +extern struct gen_pool *ghes_estatus_pool;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the system have a memory leak in
ghes_estatus_pool if the hardware or firmware changes the CPER error status
length between the peek and full read operations?
If malicious or compromised hardware reduces the length mid-read, it seems we
can permanently leak memory in the fixed-size pool:
1. ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry() allocates from ghes_estatus_pool based on
the original length from the initial hardware peek.
2. __ghes_read_estatus() performs a second fetch from hardware memory. It
accepts the new length if it is smaller than the original, persisting it
in kernel RAM.
3. ghes_proc_in_irq() later calculates the free size using
cper_estatus_len(estatus) on the copied memory.
Since the length is now smaller, gen_pool_free() would free fewer bytes than
were originally allocated. Could this eventually exhaust the pool and prevent
the kernel from queuing further NMI-based hardware errors?
> +
> static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes)
> {
> return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-topics-ahmtib01-ras_ffh_arm_internal_review-v7-0-8b3a85216cef@arm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 13:58 [PATCH v7 00/10] ACPI: APEI: share GHES CPER helpers and add DT FFH provider Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: share macros via a private header Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move CPER read helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move GHESv2 ack and alloc helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move vendor record helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move CXL CPER helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] ACPI: APEI: introduce GHES helper Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] ACPI: APEI: share GHES CPER helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] dt-bindings: firmware: add arm,ras-cper Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 13:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] RAS: add firmware-first CPER provider Ahmed Tiba
2026-07-08 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708141940.75EA51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ahmed.tiba@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox