From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Robert Marko" <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: add controller init callback
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:38:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709113841.6C47B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709112006.390742-3-robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The custom `.init` callback is evaluated unconditionally in `atmel_qspi_resume()`, bypassing required PM state restoration for non-gclk variants.
- [Medium] Unbalanced clock prepare operations on the error path of the newly added `.init()` callback in `atmel_qspi_resume()`.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing bugs in the `has_gclk` suspend/resume paths cause a PM runtime usage counter leak and perform hardware register accesses with disabled clocks.
- [High] The generic clock (`gclk`) enable count leaks continuously because `clk_prepare_enable()` is invoked unconditionally during every SPI setup.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: add controller init callback ---
commit 6c4a6f692bd1bda4ee70cd3b53efc7320ebf6191
Author: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
spi: atmel-quadspi: add controller init callback
Allow controller variants to provide a custom initialization callback
through their capability data. This prepares the driver for variants
which require a different hardware initialization sequence without
adding SoC checks to the common path.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
> index aaf7f4c46b22f..62ea84d234d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1156,6 +1159,9 @@ static int atmel_qspi_sama7g5_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> /* The controller can communicate with a single peripheral device (target). */
> aq->target_max_speed_hz = spi->max_speed_hz;
>
> + if (aq->caps->init)
> + return aq->caps->init(aq);
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does invoking initialization callbacks
from atmel_qspi_sama7g5_setup() cause a generic clock enable count leak?
The generic clock enable count appears to leak continuously because
atmel_qspi_set_gclk() unconditionally calls clk_prepare_enable().
Since spi_setup() can be called multiple times during the device lifecycle,
such as when the SPI core probes child devices or adjusts transfer speeds,
the clock's enable count repeatedly increments:
drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:atmel_qspi_set_gclk() {
...
ret = clk_prepare_enable(aq->gclk);
...
}
Because clk_disable_unprepare() is only called once during system
suspend, the clock becomes severely unbalanced and might never be fully
shut down.
> return atmel_qspi_sama7g5_init(aq);
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -1570,6 +1576,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused atmel_qspi_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (aq->caps->init)
> + return aq->caps->init(aq);
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Will this unconditional early return bypass required power management state
restoration for non-gclk variants?
If a non-gclk variant defines an init callback, it will intercept the
system resume path and completely bypass pm_runtime_force_resume() and the
default non-gclk hardware restoration sequence that occurs further down in
atmel_qspi_resume().
[Severity: Medium]
Does this also create a clock prepare count leak on the error path?
If the newly added init callback fails and returns a non-zero error code
in atmel_qspi_resume(), the function returns immediately.
This skips the necessary clk_unprepare() calls for aq->pclk and aq->qspick
that were successfully prepared earlier in atmel_qspi_resume().
> if (aq->caps->has_gclk)
> return atmel_qspi_sama7g5_init(aq);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does returning early for has_gclk
devices leak a power management runtime usage counter and access hardware
with disabled clocks?
In atmel_qspi_suspend(), pm_runtime_resume_and_get() increments the power
management usage count. For has_gclk devices, it returns early, skipping
pm_runtime_force_suspend() and missing a balancing pm_runtime_put():
drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:atmel_qspi_suspend() {
...
if (aq->caps->has_gclk) {
ret = atmel_qspi_sama7g5_suspend(aq);
clk_disable_unprepare(aq->pclk);
return ret;
}
...
}
In atmel_qspi_resume(), it calls clk_prepare() for aq->pclk but misses
clk_enable(). It then returns early via atmel_qspi_sama7g5_init(),
completely skipping pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().
As a result, every system suspend/resume cycle permanently leaks a power
management usage count.
Furthermore, because clk_enable() is never called, the hardware
initialization callback accesses registers with a disabled peripheral clock,
which could cause an asynchronous external abort or bus fault on resume:
drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:atmel_qspi_lan969x_init() {
...
atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_DLLOFF, aq, QSPI_CR);
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709112006.390742-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 11:19 [PATCH v2 0/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for LAN969x Robert Marko
2026-07-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: spi: Document LAN969x QSPI Robert Marko
2026-07-09 12:30 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-09 17:02 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: add controller init callback Robert Marko
2026-07-09 11:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: use init callback for gclk variants Robert Marko
2026-07-09 11:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] spi: atmel-quadspi: add LAN969x QSPI support Robert Marko
2026-07-09 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: microchip: lan969x: add QSPI nodes Robert Marko
2026-07-09 11:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 11:57 ` Robert Marko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709113841.6C47B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.marko@sartura.hr \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox