Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Markus Stockhausen" <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net: phy: add (*notify_phy_attach/detach)() hooks to struct mii_bus
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:42:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710064248.E5CC71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709064157.2865063-4-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The notify_phy_detach hook is called unconditionally in phy_detach(), even if notify_phy_attach() was never called or previously failed.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] phy_attach_direct() incorrectly tears down existing legitimate PHY attachments when returning -EBUSY.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net: phy: add (*notify_phy_attach/detach)() hooks to struct mii_bus ---
commit 18f2ffc9e99b8190c4b5f1090de719a18f114275
Author: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>

net: phy: add (*notify_phy_attach/detach)() hooks to struct mii_bus

This commit introduces notify_phy_attach and notify_phy_detach hooks to
struct mii_bus. These hooks allow the MDIO bus driver to perform
initialization and teardown steps when a PHY is attached or detached.

Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/21515#discussion_r2714069716
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1769053496.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/

> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 0615228459ef4..676cbf183350d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1876,6 +1876,12 @@ int phy_attach_direct(struct net_device *dev, struct phy_device *phydev,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto error;
>  
> +	if (phydev->mdio.bus->notify_phy_attach) {
> +		err = phydev->mdio.bus->notify_phy_attach(phydev);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto error;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed something about the error
handling here and earlier in the function.

If phy_attach_direct() detects the PHY is already attached:

	if (phydev->attached_dev) {
		dev_err(&dev->dev, "PHY already attached\n");
		err = -EBUSY;
		goto error;
	}

The error label unconditionally calls phy_detach().

Will this tear down the active, legitimate attachment state of the original
owner instead of just aborting the current failed attach attempt?

> +	}
> +
>  	phy_resume(phydev);
>  
>  	/**
> @@ -1919,6 +1925,9 @@ void phy_detach(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  	struct module *ndev_owner = NULL;
>  	struct mii_bus *bus;
>  
> +	if (phydev->mdio.bus->notify_phy_detach)
> +		phydev->mdio.bus->notify_phy_detach(phydev);
> +

[Severity: High]
If phy_attach_direct() fails early and jumps to the error label, it calls
phy_detach(), which completely bypasses notify_phy_attach() but
unconditionally invokes notify_phy_detach().

It also appears that if notify_phy_attach() itself returns an error,
phy_detach() will be called immediately.

Could this cause MDIO bus drivers to receive unbalanced detach events for a
PHY that was never successfully attached? Might this lead to NULL pointer
dereferences or double frees if the bus driver relies on the attach hook
to initialize state?

>  	if (phydev->devlink) {
>  		device_link_del(phydev->devlink);
>  		phydev->devlink = NULL;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709064157.2865063-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09  6:41 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Add RTL83xx support Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] dt-bindings: net: realtek,rtl9301-mdio: Add RTL83xx series Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Add polling documentation Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net: phy: add (*notify_phy_attach/detach)() hooks to struct mii_bus Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-10  6:42   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Configure hardware polling during probing Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Add page tracking Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Increase MDIO timeout Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Add support for RTL838x Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-09  6:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Add support for RTL839x Markus Stockhausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260710064248.E5CC71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus.stockhausen@gmx.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox