On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 10:41:53AM +0200, Jonas Rebmann wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Thanks, for CCing me here.
> 
> On 2026-07-13 10:23, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > sorry, I missed this. Thanks for pointing to this patch. In general i'm
> > fine with this approach, but there is something which confuses me.
> > Looking at the description, there is the statement: [default-intensity]
> > "Defaults to 0".
> > This seems to be correct for the Linux implementation of
> > leds-pwm-multicolor, but is this really an expectation along all (multi
> > color) LEDs (at least for Linux)?
> 
> You are right, sadly the initialization default of some
> multicolor-LED drivers differs.

Hmm, I forget if you had a default in leds common.yaml, but you should
probably remove it in this case and move the default to the individual
led type if so, rather than wait for support in a driver that doesn't
zero initialise.

> > E.g. leds-group-multicolor init the intensity with the maximum. So all
> > users of leds-group-multicolor should specify default-intensity for each
> > sub LED to achieve a defined behavior without breaking existing behavior.
> 
> I agree, once support is added to one of the drivers that doesn't
> zero-initialize, the documentation needs updating (because as you say,
> backwards-compatibilty probably beats consistency here).
> 
> I'm also just noticing that my v3 for only the dt-bindings never arrived
> on the list (I think I was on a buggy b4 master), I'll re-send now.
> 
> Regards,
> Jonas
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Jonas Rebmann               |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9    |