From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mohammad Rafi Shaik" <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais: Document DAI subnode
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:58:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714145854.450031F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714145250.2473461-2-mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The node-level `oneOf` block defining `clock-names` combinations incorrectly uses `additionalProperties: false` and `oneOf`, which will reject valid device tree nodes.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v5 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais: Document DAI subnode ---
commit b46d22527ffbe28aec4e679dc5521422e9052491
Author: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais: Document DAI subnode
Extend the qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais device tree binding to explicitly describe
Digital Audio Interface (DAI) child nodes. Add address and size cells to
allow representation of multiple DAI instances as child nodes, and define a
dai@<id> pattern to document per-DAI properties.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais.yaml
[ ... ]
> +patternProperties:
> + '^dai@[0-9a-f]+$':
> + type: object
> + description:
> + Q6DSP Digital Audio Interfaces.
[ ... ]
> + allOf:
> + - oneOf:
> + - properties:
> + reg: true
> + clocks: true
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: mclk
> + additionalProperties: false
> + - properties:
> + reg: true
> + clocks: true
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: bclk
> + additionalProperties: false
> + - properties:
> + reg: true
> + clocks: true
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: eclk
> + additionalProperties: false
> + - properties:
> + reg: true
> + clocks: true
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: mclk
> + - const: bclk
> + additionalProperties: false
> + - properties:
> + reg: true
> + clocks: true
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: mclk
> + - const: eclk
> + additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Medium]
Will this additionalProperties: false restriction inside the patternProperties:
'^dai@[0-9a-f]+$' block reject valid device tree nodes?
When additionalProperties: false is used inside these oneOf branches, it
restricts the node exclusively to reg, clocks, and clock-names. This means
standard meta-properties like status or $nodename will be rejected during
dtbs_check.
Also, if a device tree node omits the optional clock-names property (for
example: dai@0 { reg = <0>; };), won't it match multiple branches of the oneOf
block since the missing property vacuously satisfies the sub-schema properties
constraint in all branches? Because oneOf requires exactly one match, this
causes validation to fail and throws an error for multiple matches.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714145250.2473461-1-mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 14:52 [PATCH v5 0/3] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Add MI2S clock control Mohammad Rafi Shaik
2026-07-14 14:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais: Document DAI subnode Mohammad Rafi Shaik
2026-07-14 14:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-14 14:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ASoC: qcom: q6apm-lpass-dais: Add MI2S clock control Mohammad Rafi Shaik
2026-07-14 14:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: enhance machine driver for board-specific config Mohammad Rafi Shaik
2026-07-14 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714145854.450031F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox