From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Janani Sunil" <janani.sunil@analog.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:48:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715114822.6019C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-ad5529r-driver-v6-1-cfdf8b9f5ee3@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `spi-device-addr` array property groups multiple physical chips under a single Device Tree node, which violates core DT architecture and precludes describing per-chip resources.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v6 1/5] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property ---
commit 039a81f5133684e72f9b6f61fd5df1550f9b8b54
Author: Janani Sunil <janani.sunil@analog.com>
spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property
This commit adds a generic spi-device-addr property to describe multiple
hardware addresses for SPI devices that share a single chip select. The
property is defined as a uint32-array to be placed on the SPI peripheral
node.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ properties:
> minItems: 2
> maxItems: 4
>
> + spi-device-addr:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> + description:
> + Device address used when multiple peripherals share a single chip select.
[Severity: Medium]
Does grouping multiple physical chips under a single Device Tree node using an
array property conflict with core DT architecture?
If multiple addresses are listed here, it becomes impossible to describe
distinct per-chip hardware resources, such as individual interrupts, clocks,
or power supplies for those physical chips.
Would it be more appropriate to model the shared CS as a bridge or bus node
with #address-cells = <1>, and represent each physical chip as a distinct
child node with its own reg and discrete properties?
Since Device Tree bindings form a permanent ABI, establishing this array
pattern might permanently constrain drivers needing to represent per-chip
resources on shared chip selects.
> +
> st,spi-midi-ns:
> deprecated: true
> description: |
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715-ad5529r-driver-v6-0-cfdf8b9f5ee3@analog.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:41 [PATCH v6 0/5] iio: dac: Add support for AD5529R DAC Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 13:09 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-15 13:29 ` Nuno Sá
2026-07-15 13:37 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-15 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: microchip,mcp3564: Add spi-device-addr Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: microchip,mcp3911: " Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add AD5529R Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support Janani Sunil
2026-07-15 11:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715114822.6019C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=janani.sunil@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox