Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jai Luthra" <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add imx708 image sensor
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:39:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715173959.838B11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-imx708-v1-1-1f36f54e14d4@ideasonboard.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The IMX708 device tree binding strictly prohibits standard camera properties like `rotation`, `orientation`, and `lens-focus` by omitting the common video-interface-devices schema reference.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add imx708 image sensor ---
commit 6db06a28573083737d3c74ac1c5d01840d0d4fc3
Author: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>

dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add imx708 image sensor

This commit adds the device tree binding schema for the Sony IMX708 CMOS
sensor. It defines the I2C configuration, required power supplies, and
MIPI CSI-2 interface properties.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx708.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx708.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx708.yaml

[ ... ]

> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +  - vdig-supply
> +  - vana1-supply
> +  - vana2-supply
> +  - vddl-supply
> +  - port
> +
> +additionalProperties: false

[Severity: Medium]
Will this strict additionalProperties constraint incorrectly reject standard
camera properties like rotation or orientation?

Because this binding in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx708.yaml
does not reference the common video-interface-devices schema, standard device
tree properties describing the physical mounting of the sensor will fail
validation during dt_binding_check.

Should this binding include an allOf reference to the common schema and use
unevaluatedProperties instead of additionalProperties at the top level?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715-imx708-v1-0-1f36f54e14d4@ideasonboard.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 17:31 [PATCH 0/2] media: Add bindings and driver for Sony IMX708 Jai Luthra
2026-07-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add imx708 image sensor Jai Luthra
2026-07-15 17:39   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 18:00   ` Jai Luthra
2026-07-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: Add a driver for Sony IMX708 Jai Luthra
2026-07-15 17:43   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715173959.838B11F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox