From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3896E4302FA; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784221993; cv=none; b=qIpHpkAoiJ85N76fozR4KmEoqI1svL1UBxSDavlGD4/84Bv80JVUnL/8WgDGXavHVcjm+2YR0pRN/wDjRWcWDt8kjTQv4Mq82nR+RlJ86YVisd3ABGODBVH6krAXq41/lejWxHjMJAqrJCxcBYZZWB6K7ePVvjTi8s0aGbueYxg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784221993; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wbvS03uQ0deVl3A3C76q8Q2GRBh1dX+ZFojG3Au3OMk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=Abj19oDFoP84+yvKZwU51QtWAkNwhEiYEZCs/jiHBsgoGKHl2S35I2DlBndgttWD3TgTeuIYPbVgwGNieExky0vBA+uRKOgYF9OXTiQrOA2xrOMMe8fhTkDtshdq7hPy/GW/WE7wBYtXJIo6w3prNfdCulr3D1ZA1E9/2Nf+7jQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c3YBFMld; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c3YBFMld" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B1F1F000E9; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784221991; bh=wbvS03uQ0deVl3A3C76q8Q2GRBh1dX+ZFojG3Au3OMk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=c3YBFMldOGmsxhQ4DeGb9Ow78v9IzKcYM8mgtP+6Lnv4U/RBC74mWoR2B1nRVmp6B N5fZ5dSnwHMFhUxVfYxNje6MgejCcE3sLFYWv/u4o2dDJtc8hzvn+BkKxI9OgnaMki c86Ty4oyYORhbgshIFGk66QotejT1RUlQbf3Zp4ws1WW9t7/q+WlutJaOyEHdPSTxQ 8kxR5W19KGDia8cUWpSkxYokeKUucw7U8U7qcdHO9TjgHoSkCKI1NetBGgalr6V/CA cBT+Un8czDMhk6IcqASQ8jSeQl7lSL2Zgeax+Il62dS0OEdDjrpGLIL9WI+tYVlVHf lpFF22GBYq0XA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: tegra: Reorder reg and reg-names to match bindings Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Thierry Reding" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260716-tegra264-pcie-v8-5-23e51589229b@nvidia.com> References: <20260716-tegra264-pcie-v8-0-23e51589229b@nvidia.com> <20260716-tegra264-pcie-v8-5-23e51589229b@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:13:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20260716171311.90B1F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Thierry Reding >=20 > The ECAM region cannot be the first entry in the "reg" property, because > in that case the unit-address wouldn't match the first entry. The order > of the nodes can also not be changed to match the ECAM entry because the > ECAM region is global and outside of any of the control busses. >=20 > Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716-tegra264-p= cie-v8-0-23e51589229b@nvidia.com?part=3D5