From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m3269.qiye.163.com (mail-m3269.qiye.163.com [220.197.32.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C792E37E5F6; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.32.69 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784272372; cv=none; b=q6l3dp6HaXeZu/44PkSq+IB0phN4L+BE4wyRRfTbuoN+9Yy1CzUrMIChKflN1fiwA6VCZ16YMQOh5poap6ACHT/vNkiJHIpFU3cgyhE+h4Hh6ACEkogH+OEPsmh3zNgmIMlJChzefZigxgOyZ9q8qvQXfHxlMr105IIUcm/sGLg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784272372; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YlRIym1f+hk4LE555ReYuoQhkt2lDXlgS/4RiXh4pqc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=dJ9cv+B+U6PEkBaLZoD9nq90OfKHPIggawqSlpvzAPPm7k9+u/PE35pogVdE3NzT2pMd9aOWC7kCLqvhwa1qg17hqXYpc+sW4LLZ8cUpbbCv2nUUB3WQfY7LlljcA77zx4gp/0TS0jguwdkVDh/jnuHvtoCQkOwf/eCJCB0XrDs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b=hyLPdBxw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.32.69 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thundersoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thundersoft.com header.i=@thundersoft.com header.b="hyLPdBxw" Received: from tsdl-HP-EliteDesk-880-G6-Tower-PC.. (unknown [36.129.139.90]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 468ec0c8f; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:07:26 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: Hongyang Zhao To: neil.armstrong@linaro.org Cc: andersson@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, robh@kernel.org, srini@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com, tiwai@suse.com, Hongyang Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/6] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: q6prm: add the missing MCLK clock IDs Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:06:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20260717070655.3275253-1-hongyang.zhao@thundersoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20251008-topic-sm8x50-next-hdk-i2s-v2-1-6b7d38d4ad5e@linaro.org> References: <20251008-topic-sm8x50-next-hdk-i2s-v2-1-6b7d38d4ad5e@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a9f6ee6c9a303a9kunm2ce6559b5b59e1 X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWRgWCB1ZQUpXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlCHk9DVhlNQ0sdGUIYTh5OGlYVFA kWGhdVEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlITVVKSUJVSkhCVUJLWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKS0 lPT09IVUpLS1VKQktLWQY+ DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=hyLPdBxw1dyhKw9/hZpDyPUy9Ux/m0ekFFqsVKNs92U9vngkedVVIyP+YsfJnqqbLkwfUJ+UWeeLQZC8knrgl0qAYwR/7CXEdMX0ZjhtLuCoream5E5kh4ZBNNgHQ/69PrPCmJo23ZhfgnnQSc3JGKlmuFUBslhFcoSNLQtyhAw=; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=thundersoft.com; v=1; bh=YlRIym1f+hk4LE555ReYuoQhkt2lDXlgS/4RiXh4pqc=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; Hi Neil, On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Add the missing MCLK ids for the q6prm DSP interface. > > Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong I have tested this patch successfully on the RubikPi3 board: Tested-by: Hongyang Zhao Would you mind if I carry this patch unchanged as the first patch in the next revision of the RubikPi3 audio series, drop the RFC prefix, and preserve your authorship and the existing Reviewed-by and Signed-off-by trailers? I would also add my Signed-off-by as the person forwarding the patch. Alternatively, would you prefer to resend it as a standalone non-RFC patch? Thanks, Hongyang