From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: axp20x-i2c: Fix i2c instantiation
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:54:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717145408.C99A01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717-axp318-regulator-v4-4-50aff97084dd@baylibre.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing Error Handling / API Ambiguity causing unmatched devices to probe as AXP152.
- [High] MFD subsystem guideline violation: Hard-coded IDs used in mfd_cell array instead of PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: axp20x-i2c: Fix i2c instantiation ---
commit df6eff33eb956b610bd8100dff8a5beb1887390f
Author: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
mfd: axp20x-i2c: Fix i2c instantiation
This patch fixes I2C instantiation for the AXP20X driver by moving the
variant matching directly into the bus-specific probes. It also adds support
for the AXP323 device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260717090209.2A09B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> index 4e4ebfc78525c..64c212b76e5e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static int axp20x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> axp20x->irq = i2c->irq;
> dev_set_drvdata(axp20x->dev, axp20x);
>
> + axp20x->variant = (kernel_ulong_t)i2c_get_match_data(i2c);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but because AXP152_ID is defined
as 0, a match failure returning NULL is indistinguishable from a successful
AXP152 match.
Since the driver blindly defaults to AXP152_ID on NULL, it could configure
an unrelated device as an AXP152 PMIC if forced via a sysfs bind. Writing
PMIC configurations to an unrelated I2C device can result in hardware
damage or system crashes.
Should the variant IDs be updated to start from 1 to allow unambiguous
error checking?
> ret = axp20x_match_device(axp20x);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> index 2bbe73afff435..25509e47bedc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> @@ -1339,7 +1339,6 @@ int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
> const struct mfd_cell *cells_no_irq = NULL;
> int nr_cells_no_irq = 0;
>
> - axp20x->variant = (long)device_get_match_data(dev);
> switch (axp20x->variant) {
> case AXP152_ID:
> axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp152_cells);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there are hard-coded IDs used in the
mfd_cell arrays defined in this file:
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c:axp806_cells[] = {
{
.id = 2,
.name = "axp20x-regulator",
},
};
Using hard-coded IDs in the mfd_cell array bypasses standard subsystem
indexing. This can lead to device naming collisions in sysfs and driver
load failures. A regulator driver load failure here could cause critical
power domains to remain uninitialized, leading to an unusable system.
Would it be possible to use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO in mfd_add_devices and
avoid hard-coded id fields in the mfd_cell arrays?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717-axp318-regulator-v4-0-50aff97084dd@baylibre.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 14:31 [PATCH v4 0/5] regulator: Add X-Powers AXP318W PMIC support Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: x-powers,axp152: Document AXP318W Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 15:36 ` Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP318W PMIC Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mfd: axp20x: Constify axp313 and axp717 cells Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: axp20x-i2c: Fix i2c instantiation Jerome Brunet
2026-07-17 14:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] regulator: axp20x: add support for the AXP318W Jerome Brunet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717145408.C99A01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox