From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 03:20:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718032036.1000A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718031146.3368811-3-gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing state rollbacks in the error paths of rockchip_pd_power() can leave the hardware in an inconsistent or unusable state, leading to a kernel panic.
--
--- Patch [2]: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay ---
commit 5d8a3f8a8260643f6533a94cae0393fe9867b0cc
Author: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay
This commit adds a per-domain settle delay for the RK3576 NPU domains.
It introduces a delay_us field to rockchip_domain_info and applies the
delay in rockchip_pd_power() before restoring QoS settings.
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> index 490bbb1d1d8e8..1787f62ba3a81 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -667,6 +668,9 @@ static int rockchip_pd_power(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd, bool power_on)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a problem with the
error path in rockchip_pd_power() when a domain transition fails.
When the genpd framework attempts to power off a domain and
rockchip_pd_power() is called with power_on set to false, the driver
successfully idles the bus interconnect:
if (!power_on) {
rockchip_pmu_save_qos(pd);
/* if powering down, idle request to NIU first */
ret = rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(pd, true);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
If the subsequent call to rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, false) fails
due to a hardware timeout, the function jumps to the out label without
reverting the idle request.
The genpd framework seems to gracefully handle the error by keeping the
domain status as GENPD_STATE_ON. However, when a consumer device later
resumes and attempts to access its MMIO registers, the interconnect remains
physically idled.
Can this cause the bus to hang and raise an SError, leading to a kernel
panic? Would it be appropriate to revert the idle request in the error path
before returning?
>
> + if (pd->info->delay_us)
> + udelay(pd->info->delay_us);
> +
> rockchip_pmu_restore_qos(pd);
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718031146.3368811-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-18 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 3:11 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] pmdomain/rockchip: cycle optional power-domain resets on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] iommu/rockchip: take all DT clocks Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/rockchip: clear stale page faults before enabling stall Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576: add NPU (RKNN) nodes Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260718032036.1000A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox