From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] i2c: of-prober: Defer regulator_disable() on successful probe in simple helper
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:06:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721080602.26A121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721075226.2347933-7-wenst@chromium.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unconditional 100ms boot delay during cleanup when no I2C component is found.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v3 6/9] i2c: of-prober: Defer regulator_disable() on successful probe in simple helper ---
commit ea6b3a85720b084309159275d4c96f6a15c76ff3
Author: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
i2c: of-prober: Defer regulator_disable() on successful probe in simple helper
This commit introduces a 100ms delay before disabling the regulator during
cleanup. This allows async drivers time to probe and increment the
regulator enable count, avoiding hardware re-initialization delays.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -235,11 +235,23 @@ static int i2c_of_probe_simple_enable_regulator(struct device *dev, struct i2c_o
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void i2c_of_probe_simple_disable_regulator(struct device *dev, struct i2c_of_probe_simple_ctx *ctx)
> +static void i2c_of_probe_simple_disable_regulator(struct device *dev,
> + struct i2c_of_probe_simple_ctx *ctx,
> + bool defer_disable)
> {
> if (!ctx->supply)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Wait a bit of time for async drivers to probe and increase the
> + * regulator enable count. This allows the drivers to check and
> + * skip waiting for re-initialization.
> + */
> + if (defer_disable) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Deferring regulator disable\n");
> + msleep(100);
> + }
> +
> dev_dbg(dev, "Disabling regulator supply \"%s\"\n", ctx->opts->supply_name);
>
> regulator_disable(ctx->supply);
[ ... ]
> @@ -401,7 +413,7 @@ void i2c_of_probe_simple_cleanup(struct device *dev, void *data)
> i2c_of_probe_simple_disable_gpio(dev, ctx);
> i2c_of_probe_simple_put_gpiod(ctx);
>
> - i2c_of_probe_simple_disable_regulator(dev, ctx);
> + i2c_of_probe_simple_disable_regulator(dev, ctx, true);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause an unconditional 100ms boot delay if no I2C component is
found?
When i2c_of_probe_component() finishes its scan without finding a
responding component, it still unconditionally calls ops->cleanup():
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c:i2c_of_probe_component() {
...
if (ops->cleanup)
ops->cleanup(dev, ctx);
...
}
This invokes i2c_of_probe_simple_cleanup(), which now passes
defer_disable = true, triggering the msleep(100) even when nothing was
probed.
Could this delay be skipped if no component was actually found?
> i2c_of_probe_simple_put_supply(ctx);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721075226.2347933-1-wenst@chromium.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 7:52 [PATCH v3 0/9] arm64: mediatek: Chromebook trackpad supply fixes Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] regulator: core: Add "enable and wait" functions Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 8:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 8:22 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 9:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Input: elan_i2c - sort include statements Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 10:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] Input: elan_i2c - Wait for initialization after enabling regulator supply Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 8:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] HID: i2c-hid-of: skip post-power-on delay if powered on sufficiently long Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 8:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] i2c: of-prober: " Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] i2c: of-prober: Defer regulator_disable() on successful probe in simple helper Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 8:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-21 10:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] platform/chrome: of_hw_prober: Add delay for hana trackpads Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 10:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Unmark trackpad supply as always-on Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-21 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192-asurada-spherion: Add Synaptics trackpad's supply Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721080602.26A121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox