Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v30 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:30:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724083029.017E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724-imx-se-if-v30-4-ce8ba256692c@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] The newly introduced `priv_dev_ctx` and its `devname` string are dynamically allocated but never freed on probe failure or device unbind, leading to a permanent memory leak.

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] DMA buffer is freed unconditionally on timeout while the hardware may still be processing the command, leading to use-after-free and DMA memory corruption.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v30 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv ---
commit 12d4f3d474262e1d23dd156bdd3a71ae735f6977
Author: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>

firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv

Add priv_dev_ctx to prepare enabling misc-device context based send-receive
path, to communicate with FW.

> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> index a2ede9c01691d..524ebc0f697e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,9 @@ int ele_get_info(struct se_if_priv *priv, struct ele_dev_info *s_info)
>  	tx_msg->data[0] = upper_32_bits(get_info_addr);
>  	tx_msg->data[1] = lower_32_bits(get_info_addr);
>  	tx_msg->data[2] = sizeof(*s_info);
> -	ret = ele_msg_send_rcv(priv, tx_msg, ELE_GET_INFO_REQ_MSG_SZ, rx_msg,
> -			       ELE_GET_INFO_RSP_MSG_SZ);
> +
> +	ret = ele_msg_send_rcv(priv->priv_dev_ctx, tx_msg, ELE_GET_INFO_REQ_MSG_SZ,
> +			       rx_msg, ELE_GET_INFO_RSP_MSG_SZ);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		ele_get_info_cleanup(priv, get_info_data, get_info_addr, ELE_GET_INFO_BUFF_SZ);
>  		return ret;
>  	}

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path free the DMA buffer
while the hardware might still be active?

If ele_msg_send_rcv() times out, it returns -ETIMEDOUT and trips the fw_busy
circuit breaker. However, this error path unconditionally calls
ele_get_info_cleanup(), which releases the DMA buffer back to the system:

static void ele_get_info_cleanup(...)
{
	if (priv->mem_pool)
		gen_pool_free(priv->mem_pool, (unsigned long)buf, size);
	else
		dma_free_coherent(priv->dev, size, buf, d_addr);
}

If the firmware is merely slow and eventually processes the command, won't it
execute a delayed DMA write to the freed physical address, potentially
corrupting whatever kernel memory is subsequently mapped there?

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> index e9e2f48f4f71f..b053dd00286c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c
> @@ -411,6 +441,12 @@ static int se_if_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		load_fw->is_fw_tobe_loaded = true;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = init_misc_device_context(priv, 0, &priv->priv_dev_ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +				     "Failed[0x%x] to create device contexts.",
> +				     ret);
> +

[Severity: Medium]
Will this leak the newly allocated priv->priv_dev_ctx and its devname string
on probe failure or device unbind?

The init_misc_device_context() function dynamically allocates these resources
using non-devm kzalloc_obj() and kasprintf(). However, if probe fails at a
later step or the device is unbound, the devres-managed cleanup function
se_if_probe_cleanup() only frees priv and misses the context:

static void se_if_probe_cleanup(void *context)
{
	...
	if (priv->tx_chan)
		mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_chan);

	dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);

	kfree(priv);
}

Should the cleanup function be updated to also free priv->priv_dev_ctx and
its devname to avoid a permanent memory leak?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724-imx-se-if-v30-0-ce8ba256692c@nxp.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24  9:05 [PATCH v30 0/7] firmware: imx: driver for NXP secure-enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  8:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 3/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  8:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  8:30   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 5/7] firmware: drivers: imx: adds miscdev pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  8:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  8:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: add reserved memory property pankaj.gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260724083029.017E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox