From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hermes Wu" <Hermes.wu@ite.com.tw>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: media: add ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI bridge
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:33:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727023358.84B791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727-upstream-it6625-it6626-v8-1-2c3b0f9524fc@ite.com.tw>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The device tree schema incorrectly allows `bus-type` to be configured as C-PHY (1) for `ite,it6625` devices, which only support D-PHY (4).
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: media: add ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI bridge ---
commit fa0e1ae27e2934f8fdb2a29be488c42a9ccd6645
Author: Hermes Wu <Hermes.wu@ite.com.tw>
dt-bindings: media: add ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI bridge
Document the devicetree binding for the ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI to
MIPI CSI-2 bridge. The device exposes two graph ports and supports
split or clone mode.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ite,it6625.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ite,it6625.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..756fe655f534f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ite,it6625.yaml
[ ... ]
> + port@0:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description: CSI-2 output port MIPI0
> +
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> + properties:
> + data-lanes:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 4
> +
> + bus-type:
> + enum:
> + - 1 # MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_CPHY
> + - 4 # MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_DPHY
[ ... ]
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: ite,it6626
> + then:
> + properties:
> + ports:
> + properties:
> + port@0:
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
> + required:
> + - bus-type
[Severity: Medium]
The patch notes mention dropping the allOf branch that forces bus-type to
const 4 for ite,it6625 because the value is implied by the compatible string.
Does removing this constraint prevent the schema from verifying the hardware
limitations?
Since the base endpoint property allows both C-PHY (1) and D-PHY (4) globally,
if a devicetree author explicitly adds bus-type = <1> to an ite,it6625 node,
wouldn't the schema silently pass validation even though the hardware only
supports D-PHY?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727-upstream-it6625-it6626-v8-0-2c3b0f9524fc@ite.com.tw?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 2:28 [PATCH v8 0/2] media: i2c: add support for ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI to MIPI CSI-2 bridge Hermes Wu via B4 Relay
2026-07-27 2:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: media: add ITE IT6625/IT6626 HDMI bridge Hermes Wu via B4 Relay
2026-07-27 2:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 6:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-27 6:24 ` Hermes.Wu
2026-07-27 2:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] media: i2c: add driver for ITE IT6625/IT6626 Hermes Wu via B4 Relay
2026-07-27 2:38 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727023358.84B791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Hermes.wu@ite.com.tw \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox